I paid £1k for my bike, which some people thing is a silly amount of money already but as Richard's illustrated above, it really isn't difficult to spend a small family car budget on a bike that most definitely won't make you 9 times faster.
It might be my age but I still hanker for the golden age of bike design when they were all made from skinny steel tubes beautifully welded together.
I'm certainly not saying I would pay that for a bike, but they are 'if money's no object' bikes
And, of course I agree that they're not that much faster, except uphill - or is that psychological??
Do you know of this site, if not, it will definately interest you!!
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/
As for what I have paid (in the past) for bikes
1990 = (circa) £1,300 for a Pace Research RC100 (well before they started producing suspension forks)
http://retro-pace-mtb.wetpaint.com/
1994 = £1,200 for a Dyna-Tech 755Ti, with a few alterations (Campag Chorus chainset, Ritchey stem & seat-pin/'Flite' saddle/Scott Drop-Ins)
It's now downgraded, & is my work bike/trainer
Edited: 21/06/2012 at 16:25