Yep - the most important thing (essential) to revise would be for the distance to be correctly measured for 10K (and then the shorter distances to be advertised for whatever they turn out to be - even if same finish point required for logistics etc.).
Also, what 'count meout ' and 'blacktoenails' say above.
Just an observation really , I notice from the results that there didn't appear to be many club runners, although I saw a few shirts around the course. I was wondering why this was ? (was it due to lay out of entry form? e.g. asking for unit etc. but not club - I can't remember. ) Either way, it might just be worth changing the form if so that that eveyone knows that everyone is welcome (club runners and 'unattached', as well as regulars and reservists etc) so that 'civilians' don't get put off by wrongly assuming that it is essentially an 'army event' (and so more entries) and so whoever colates the results can put the names of clubs in etc. (so runners can compare how they are doing to other clubs / to clubs etc.). Anyway, just a thought.
Look forwar to it next year. Cheers, Richard.