Join Cancer Research UK's Pretty Muddy event!
Pretty Muddy is the UK’s first women-only 5k charity obstacle course. The event can be as challenging as you want to make it. Climb, jump and laugh all over cancer.
Pretty Muddy is about overcoming obstacles together as a collective force, united in the fight against cancer.
A combination of fun, challenge and of course mud, take the obstacles at your own pace and show cancer you mean business.
FInd out more at http://raceforlife.cancerresearchuk.org/pretty-muddy/index.html
After you using the boards to spam your race instead of going down the route of every other race organiser and advertising properly and after Cancer Research withdrew their RFL from my local town for 'not raising enough', despite having to hold two events in one day and THEN reading the following (written by a friend, so I know 100% not spam)....Thanks but no thanks. Your organisation appears more interested in commercial rather than altruistic pursuits these days:
"I was diagnosed with womb cancer in January 2012 having had a terrible few months with symptoms. At the time of my diagnosis, I was told that I was in the minority in that I was under the age of 60 and fit; my hobby is running and I ran 5 marathons in 2011, the last one being just before my symptoms started. I have since found out that I am not really in the minority. I have, through WCSUK, been in contact with women much younger than I. Last year, shortly after my radiotherapy finished, I took part in a Race for Life where a cancer survivor stood up on the stage and spoke about her experience of breast cancer. I said to my friends that I would want to do that this year. So a few months ago I contacted Cancer Research UK Race for Life and asked about speaking at their Hyde Park event. They agreed and it was arranged for me to speak before both the 10k and 5k races. So this morning, I arrived nice and early (8am) and found I was due to speak at 8.08am but they seemed to be a bit disorganised; the sound checks hadn't been run at that point. One of the organisers came to me a while later and explained that they were running behind time and would like to concentrate my efforts before the 5k race after I had run the 10k. Hmmmmmmmm! There was a lot of nothing going on at the time but I suppose these things happen eh? I did point out that, because of the heat, I would probably take longer than I thought originally and asked to be scheduled as late as possible; I can't run in the heat at all and really suffer. I was told that would be ok. Off I went and I struggled round the race; it felt like I was melting at times! As soon as I finished, I headed back to the stage where I was told, again, that they were running behind schedule. I was told they would like me to speak at the start of the race and that I would be taken down there just beforehand. I was starting to feel a bit like the poor relative by this time. A little while later, one of the organisers came and got me and I went behind the barrier and then she instantly disappeared! I waited for a good 15 minutes and she didn't return. I was getting slightly hacked off by this time so I decided to just walk away. I am quite hurt that this happened to me. I have been looking forward to today and getting the message out about womb cancer. This was a chance to reach around 15,000 women at the same time across the two races and I feel very let down. There were a couple of key messages I wanted to get across. There are several conditions that make a woman pre-disposed to womb cancer (being overweight, being childless, being diabetic, being unfit and being over 60). I was none of these. So I wanted to get the message across that this is a cancer that can strike ANYONE at ANY time of their lives. From experience, some women are under the impression that their cervical smear would detect womb cancer but this is not the case. The only time it would detect it would be if it had already spread to the cervix. I also wanted to point out that womb cancer is on the rise and that obesity could be a factor going forward as the extra fat in our bodies causes oestrogen-like hormones to be produced and womb cancer is mainly hormone receptive. Now, I consider those messages are vital for the women in this country. There is n
Of course you are dear, you're male.
I think they should open it up to men but make them complete a H&S questionnaire first, to make sure they can get around the course without killing themselves or others. Questions could include:
Have you ever hit your thumb with a hammer whilst trying to hang a picture?
Where do you keep your spanner?
How would you turn off the water in an emergency?
Have you ever run over/cut through the electrical wire of a piece of gardening equipment?
What is your spouse's date of birth?
Are you always right or are you always wrong?
Can you carry off pink?
In a pictorial representation of your feet, which would be left and which right?
Can you put your left foot in front of your right and then your right foot in front of you left?
Can you do this whilst looking ahead and without falling down?
What is the name of Bridget Jones' boyfriend?
Any man who tick NO to one or more of the above needs to be excluded. Any that know the answer to the last, should be put down.
I really, really hate women-only events.
Wouldn't touch it with a barge pole.
And as CD says, please pay for your advertising rather than spamming - although I think you can get your event listed in the Events section for free.
Agreed Wilkie, I can't be doing with them either, although I can understand the attraction for some women and tbh, if it gets them out exercising than I'm all for it. I do find them a bit 'pink and cuddly' for my tastes but my biggest gripes with this particular 'fund raiser' are detailed above - and I hadn't even mentioned my thoughts on their marathon place deals (although tbf, they're not the only ones who play that scam for all it's worth)!
I'm not keen on women-only events either but have to admit I can somewhat see the appeal of an event involving loads of women rolling around in mud together.
So can I, but I prefer custard.
The problem with the CRUK RfL events is that they're expensive and none of the entry fee ends up in the research pot. OK, raising awareness, I get that, but £15 for a 5k charity event? Come on.
I don't see why these events are so expensive, and yet none of the entry fee goes toward actual research.
Local organisers put on races for £10 entry, and they cover their costs and make some money as well.
Whilst agreeing that the experience of that woman in the first reply is totally unaccpetable and the charity should take a look at itself, I must admit I find some of the replies here a bit odd. People often complain that not all the money from charity events goes to the charitable end of things - but then at least two people on this thread want this person not to post on here for free but to go away and pay for advertising, which would, would it not, divert money away from the charitable cause. You can't really have it both ways! That's not to say that these forums should necessarily be open for posts such as these - I personally have no problem with people posting like this and it's far better than something corporate or, indeed, half the stupid posts by a number of people on here whom I shall not name. It would be a problem if every other post was an 'ad' for a charity run, but they're not, so I don't really have an issue with it. Until that point is reached, why not just ignore it?
If you want information on what the entry fee covers, go here http://raceforlife.cancerresearchuk.org/utilities/faqs/fees/index.html.
You might not agree it's right, but I think they're at least transparent about it. Not one single charity in the whole wide wonderful world runs without overheads, and if they say they do, they're lying.
Peter collins........I would like to see the breakdown of the money involved as I cannot see how the amount of moeny raised by entry fees could ever equal the overheads unless there are some astronomincal salaries somewhere........most of the things they say the entry fees are used for are a one of fee that can be used for many mant events...with the number of people taking part then I cannot see how someone is not taking a huge chunk out of it........
If You could show me the figures to prove me wrong i would be pleased to be proved wrong.......Of course charities have overheads........but the millions that are taking in entry fees for the race is a hell of a lot of overheads
Seren, I'm not anything to do with CRUK. Its accounts should be readily available somewhere. The bottom line for all charities is how much they raise - if they spend more money but in doing so raise more money, they're arguably doing things right. If, for example, a charity grows and needs more staff to do admin jobs, it will obviously spend more money on salaries, but those people will enable it to raise more money. It might in the process need bigger offices, run up bigger phone bills, pay more for heating and so on. On the question of salaries - I have no idea how much the top people earn at CRUK, though I suspect the chief executive doesn't do too badly. There are two points to be made on this: it's argued that if you get good top people in and the charity subsequently brings in more money, it's been worth paying the extra salary. And, indeed, there are some people earning six-figure salaries in some of the bigger charities. Naturally, that's controversial even in the charity sector, and is worthy of debate. The second thing, though, is that the vast majority of charities are tiny affairs, usually run by their founders, employing nothing but volunteers and existing in a hand-to-mouth way. So if people have a problem with such as CRUK, it's not representative of the sector as a whole.
Data Admin Executive
Local Fundraising Manager - Sheffield, Huddersfield and Halifax
Just four of the people that would play some part in organising something like RFL, one of whom is very likely to be the person who indulged in a little free advertising via the forum. And all that before you get around to race licences, policing costs, etc. Like I said, it's a commercial enterprise and is run as such, which, just like the Great Runs, is why entries are so expensive.
Anyway, my point was that aside from abusing the forum to spam their race (and like Wilkie, I don't know if there is a cost involved on putting it on the race listings page), the RFL style single sex events no longer have the feel of a nice charity event to them, more a cynical marketing exercise.
And yes, why no men's events?
I say again, why do you not want charities (which are accused here of not passing money on to the cause - even though much more is passed on than people generally believe) to have free advertising? I'm neither here nor there about women-only events - that they are very well attended probably says something about what a lot of women think about them. If you feel so strongly about them, take a banner along, or try to run with them. It's not a cause I'd care to join in with you, though!
Now, go here to be outraged (see p32). http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/prod_consump/groups/cr_common/@abt/@gen/documents/image/cr_111520.pdf
It's not that I particularly want them to spend money on the advertising, I just would prefer them NOT to spam the forum.
The Events section would be the appropriate place to put information about the event, particularly if it is free.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |