I believe most specialist running shops don’t operate that sort of
"crazy over generous policy",
and a good thing too in my opinion, as it would be a disservice to the customer to do so.
A lot of people (and don’t assume I’m including you B&T) automatically blame their shoes for any injury or problem that arises.
By not ‘having’ to refund/return a shoe at the customer’s request (or demand) because of a problem, it forces a bit of interaction to go into the circumstances leading up to the problem/injury – and more often than not - will probably work out what was the real cause (which might well turn out to be the shoe!).
It is human nature for the customer not to initially be comfortable doing this – to possibly admit that they themselves may have contributed to the problem (and it wasn’t all the shoe’s fault after all!).
By Sweatshop allowing the customer not to have to do this - and let them decide for themselves that the shoe was the sole cause of all their woes – I believe is allowing a lot of easily solvable, injury causing practices to go on un-resolved.
Edited: 17/03/2013 at 16:20