Asics Gt-2000 vs Brooks adrenaline 13

Have you tried both?

5 messages
04/02/2013 at 02:00
Have you tried the Asics Gt-2000 and Brooks adrenaline 13? Could you tell me your thoughts on them please relative to one another?
PSC    pirate
04/02/2013 at 05:33
Brooks every time. Asics give me blisters. It's obviously the shape of my feet.
PSC    pirate
04/02/2013 at 05:36
And should have added..... Your feet and your running style are unique. Go with what feels right for you.
22/02/2013 at 09:49

I'd always go with Brooks, Asics give me blisters too, but you need to go with what suits your foot best!

23/02/2013 at 20:40

They are as 'good' as each other.

The Adrenaline is a bit more stable in the rearfoot but but the diffrence prpbably would make a diffrence to most.

So assuming they are both the right stability for - the 'best' one is the one that has the best 'fit'.

They don't have exactly the same fit and one will match your foot better than the other.

One will feel more 'glove like', contour your foot better, flex in the right places and generally feel less that you have something on your foot - less noticeable and possibly feels lighter (whether or not it actually is).

That's the one to go for.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
5 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums