The main difference I found when I was looking is the 110 only displays average pace where the 210 has a choice of average or current pace.
I only wanted the very basic features, current pace and distance. I'm sure both watches can do a lot more but for me the 210 suited my requirements and I've been very happy with it.
I think that's right, Jay.
The most important thing is to decide what you want your GPS watch to do for you. For me, I really only wanted the basics, so the 110 does me just fine.
There is a danger with the "cleverer" GPS devices that you end up with information overload, and over-analysing your performances.
All a question of personal preference!
I have a 110 which I really love - does everything that I need it to do and looks just like a watch and not a bulky bit of kit.
The only thing is that it does crash ocassionally which is really annoying because it loses all your data... grr
Personally I would prefer having lap pace rather than current pace I think (like the 110 shows)
I have a 210 - well actually Garmin have it at the moment because it's dead
It was great whilst I was using it (all of 2 months) but i've been without it for a couple of weeks now, without news of its return.
This appears to be a common problem with the 210. Google the Garmin forums to see if the 110 has similar issues.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |