I'm not in any way suggestingthat this is a bad idea but I'd be genuinely interested to know why you are thinking about making the switch.
You can try to change your running gait without purchasing minimalist shoes though wearing the minimalist shoes will help. If you heel strike and you run this way in minimalist shoes it will hurt. I ran in socks on a treadmill to get used to it at first.
I went the whole hog and bought Vibram 5 Fingers (Bikila LS) last year and while the switching of running styles was relatively easy for me, the transition stage is a long slow process - not to mention the calf pain.
I was starting back from an 18 month gap due to achilles injury so the fact you start at 400-600 metres and increase this by 10% each run (according to many barefoot running sources - I had a long time to do the research ) didnt drive me nuts though I can imagine a regular runner would always want to push it further and quicker..... the phrase TMTS (too much too soon) is used a lot to describe this.
Just dont do it too quickly. You could try a shoe with a slightly lower drop from heel to toe and then next time you need shoes go a tad further. That way you will get plenty of time to gradually adjust to the new style of runningis you supination occurring on push off? If so that is fairly normal if or those of us with a high arch.
Looking at the brookes cadence my self for the same reasons im curently being coached to run midfoot and have been advised to go to a minimalist shoe they dont come cheap tho hope its worth the transittion !!
I'm just getting used to a pair of nike free 3.0s. As you have said, they do force you to change style. You wouldn't want to heel strike in them. And take it slow. You will get pain in your calves. But I feel that it has all been worth it. The only thing that is slightly uncomfortable is running fast down hill.
I've just bought some Brooks Cadence (see other thread about Brooks sizing/smaller than usual?). These fit like a glove and I love them. More support than a 'minimal minimalist' shoe...if that makes sense. They weigh about 260g and seem to be mid range in terms of weight between a usual shoe and a racer, as a result they offer a fair bit more support.
However....I over pronate and was looking for something lighter to do track/intervals/race up to 10k. . . so they may not be suitable (if my understanding of pronation and supination is correct?) Hope that helps.
I prefer the saucony kinvara to brooks connect! Better grip and more comfortable, I find the support reasonable on them too plus they are very slightly lighter!!!
I'm 4 weeks into running in Nike Free 5s. Start slow and short and build very gradually. I was a massive heel striker and constantly getting injuries so this is a real change for me. I am (so far) very glad to improve my gait, balance and style though and feel as if it will be worth it in the long run.
I am a supinator with a very high arch and I naturally run on the balls of my feet. I only started running about Xmas time and have had lots of issues due to leg length differences Causing sciatic pain. I am running in 4mm drop Skechers go run ride. They are what a nike free Should be. They are about 285g in a size 12, very flexible and with an upper that is as comfy as a sock, the heel is cut away which is to encourage forefoot landing and they are relatively cheap (can be had for £35 ish from eBay). oh- and they are a really wider fit! the size 11 is bigger than a new balance 1080v3 in size 1with and 4E width. II would recommend trying them on if you can get to a Skechers shop.
I'm not saying you shouldn't be cautious in switching to a minimalist shoe, but just to give a different perspective - like paul r I had a long gap due to an achilles tear, then started again; kept getting calf problems. Left it a bit longer, then started again but this time using vibrams some of the time and trail shoes the rest. The vibrams have been great and the calf problem has pretty much gone I didn't do a very incremental approach like paul r, but still didn't have any problems with the vibrams.
What I don't do is run on roads, which is a completely different kettle of fish.
I'm not sure it matters what shoe we use if we're after a minamalistic training shoe. It should be flatish, shouldn't have a lot of rubber on the sole, and it should have enough room for the forefoot to do it's stuff.
I built up my mileage slowly in a pair of vivobarefoots and concentrated on getting my running form half decent (which I think is a life long process).
I've never had any problems with my calves; I try not to use them to propel me forward - it's a small muscle not designed to move a lot of weight.
The important things, IME, is to transition carefully and improve our running form.
I've got a weird idea to run an Autumn Marathon next Year in VFF Bikilas (or even Xero shoes Huaraches!)
In a few weeks I start training for a spring marathon but plan on running in 'proper' shoes (depends on transition). Am up to 4 miles in VFF's thus far and 5 is planned tomorrow. I'm taking things slowly and can feel different areas of my calves as I play with footfall. One thing I have noticed is that my Cadence in 'proper' shoes averages 164spm and in the VFF's it averages 180spm. Oh, and find it harder running downhill in the vibrams at the moment (pity as Loch Ness has a 2,000ft incline but 3,000ft decline so need to work on that).
JO -- Sorry for the late come-back on this but the thread dropped off my radar... Anyway, yes I remember reading somewhere that pronation issues are exasperated by heel striking... I've recently got a pair of Nike Free 3.0s and combining those with an attempt at improved running form I definitely feel lighter on my feet, although as this is a recent thing I'm only doing short distances at the moment... I hadn't heard that the Nike Frees don't respond well to anything over 10 miles... Why is that? Also, I'd be interested to know how your progress to date has been... What kind of distances are you doing, and you've you changed your form, etc?
Interesting discussion. I would like to share my journey. I started running on Kayano's (with anti pronation block). After a while I discovered the minimalistic range and different running styles. I went to a Pose running workshop and a Chi running workshop. I made videos of my running and I was not following my own style any more. That said... I switched the the Pure Flow (Brooks) and that felt great. I also bought Kinvara 3 and recently the Kinvara 4. I have the Minimus MT10 and the Minimus 10 MR (road and trail shoes) and even the Merrel Bare Access. yes yes shoe addict. They all run OK, no aches and pains. Almost all shoes have a 4 mm drop, only the Bare Access has 0 mm.
But...now that I am running longer distances I started looking at other shoes and chose recently for the Hoka! Yes.. looking at the images you might think that I am mad. But I still believe that it is OK to train feet on the shoes without any cushioning, but on the long runs it seems wiser to have something on your feet. These Hoka shoes are also 4 mm drop shoes and pretty light but with more protection.
Something to think about maybe. I still don't feel that there is only one way to run and it almost seems that runners are not 'allowed' to run in shoes, as if barefoot running is always better and more natural. Well.. let's wait and see how that holds in a couple of years. For the longer runs I am using the Hoka now.
RunningMax -- Thanks for sharing your journey... Agree that this is an interesting discussion... As you've been to Chi and Pose running workshops I'm definitely interested to hear your views on those techniques. I'm not so sure where the "runners are not allowed to run in shoes" feeling comes from... On this site it's the "go and get gait analysis" brigade that seem to be most vocal... That said, for me, it's more about running form than the shoes... The minimalist shoes just enable me to get a better feel of how my feet are making contact with the ground. I'm only about three weeks into this so I don't have a hard and fast view of things but thought it would be worth giving it ago after researching various running techniques. Oh, my furthest distance with this is 4K so I don't currently have much of a concept of a "long" run.
Millsy -- Encouraging to hear that you've had over 800 miles from your Nike Frees. Dare I ask what you went for after binning them? Also, were they the 3s, 4s, or 5s?
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |