ive been running in nike triax 11 for the past few months and have had no problems but time for new shoes is upon me and im thinking of changing to the nike equalon.
im a moderste overproantor and like my shoes to be squashy and well cushioned, any opinions on the equalon and anyone know if theres any great difference between the triax and equalon ? equalon is about £15-20 more than the triax and is it worth it ?
any opinions appreciated, thanks
I had equalon +2 and didn't like the fit. Before them I had Triax +10 and wanted to "step up" to equalon because you'd think more expensive = better fit, etc.
I then bought Triax +11 and they felt much much better, a lot more suportive (heel) and bouncy.
Couldn't quite put my finger on why I didn't like the equalon, in my opinion they felt a bit lifeless?
Just put an order in for Triax +12.......
hey. what is the difference in weight between nike triax +11 and nike equalon?? Anybody knows??
Neither is better or worse than the other.
The Equalon is slightly more supportive and slightly more cushioned, while the Triax is more responsive.
That`s right Ben. I like both. I had 2 pairs of Triax but got a bunion with 2nd pair and then moved up to Equalons and never looked back. Until they stopped making them!
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |