Speed Distance Watches

9 messages
28/09/2002 at 18:00
Hi ,
Has anyone got experiences (good or bad) of the speed/distance watches, Nike or Timex ?

Cheers.
28/09/2002 at 22:02
timex is great speed/distance, very accurate and keeps you motivated.
28/09/2002 at 22:52
Hi Ralph,

I've got the Nike SDM - been using it for getting on for a year now. I've found it very accurate and a terrific training tool. I've posted stuff about positive experiences with it on another thread:

http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/forum/forummessages.asp?URN=5&UTN=383&SP=&V=1#22848

That said, I had some teething troubles with it when I first got it and I've also posted about those:

http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/forum/forummessages.asp?URN=5&UTN=1056&SP=&V=1#11532

Looking through these forums and also takling to runners who've used both, there seems to be a pretty even mix of positive/negative experiences with both the Nike SDM and the Timex.

My *personal* preference would be for the SDM, though, as reasonably accurate pace measurement's important to me - more so than distance - and the Timex has been reported on at least one thread as sometimes giving variable results on the pace. Can't comment on that as I've not used one.

Dave
28/09/2002 at 22:53
And that should be "talking" not "takling" .. it's late! ;-)

Dave
Guy
28/09/2002 at 23:41
I have had both, and recommend that Timex as more reliable. Added to which, if you are injured or cross-training, you can use the Timex when you are cycling, whereas the Nike can only be used for running.
29/09/2002 at 22:43
I've got the Timex, and would heartily recommend it to anyone. The accuracy seems very good indeed (measured 6.27 miles for a recent 10k race, and 13.25 miles for todays half marathon) It's great for pacing in a race, as it's more accurate than posted mile markers (such as at Windsor today, where they were all over the place), and is brilliant for training runs as it frees you from the constraints of running measured courses. I've run with a friend who has the Nike SDM, and the Timex has been more accurate on every occasion (she gets different readings from her Nike according to what pace she runs at...)

In short, I'm a fan. The worst thing I can say about it is that I've got a white, untanned patch on my left upper arm where it sits!

venom
30/09/2002 at 08:48
I have both, but have given up on the Nike SDM because it keeps breaking (see previous posts). Having said that, I would prefer the Nike if it worked because of its automatic lap timing (brilliant feature) and the fact that I still get very odd pace data from my Timex.
01/10/2002 at 15:34
I presume you are talking about the Timex Garmin GPS watch. I am a relative beginner (aiming for 10k as my next goal). Is it worth me treating myself to it?
01/10/2002 at 15:47
Helen - I do think it's worth treating yourself. Once you've got it you'll find all sorts of uses for it. Apart from just measuring your routes (my original reason for getting one) you can use it to ensure that you are maintaining the correct pace for whichever session you are doing. Another wonderful benefit is doing interval training on a random, unmeasured course.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
9 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums