Waterproof socks?

Good for winter or a gimmick?

9 messages
08/11/2012 at 20:10

As the wetter season approaches and the cold and icy mornings, wondering if I should invest in some waterproof socks - always avoided waterproof shoes as I figure that the first puddle = wet feet, but wondering whether socks are a sensible way to go, and in which case which are good? Not looking to spend a mint...

08/11/2012 at 20:21

IMHO waterproof socks (seal skinz etc) are horrible.

 Uncomfortable and your feet sweat real bad. Don't waste your money.

I have run in wettest, coldest and most horrid conditions this country can offer and feel whatever the weather your feet have to breathe and dispite what the sales garb says your feet won't in this type of sock. 


08/11/2012 at 21:08

They seem to be a real 'marmite' thing. I've never bought them as I can't stomach paying out £20 - 30 for a pair of socks, but I've got friends who wear them and roughly half of them hate them and half love them.

09/11/2012 at 09:38

crap to run in; great to MTB in

09/11/2012 at 10:28
They're good in snow but that's about it
09/11/2012 at 11:16

I've tried Seal Skinz socks and gloves (not for running) and thought they were crap.  Neither were waterproof.

09/11/2012 at 17:17

Right, reckon I'll give 'em a miss - never had that much of a problem with wet feet, it's part of the game.

10/11/2012 at 14:27

As above, useful in snow and really cold slush, but otherwise too sweaty and you still feel the cold of the water.

11/11/2012 at 06:07

I've considered them for cycling, and have a mate who swears by them for that, but I wouldn't think they'd be great for running in.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
9 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump