Each of those shoes suit a slightly different foot shape Ross, have tried all 3 and the difference between them was quite surprising.. If you have a wide foot look at the 295, narrower its the 285...
btw, any reason why the Talon 212 didn`t make your short list..??
285s more of a racing shoe, sits lower to the ground (2 arrow sole) and has the tighter fitting performance last.. The softer compound soles of the Talon 212 - Roclite 285/295 grip very well on wet tarmac, only time my feet have slipped with the Talons has been during sharp decents on wet (rock & wooden surfaces)
Its been raining solid for the last 30hrs and I`m just about to head out for a mixed terrain 8miler, wouldn`t want to complete this run in anything other than the Talon 212`s...
Hope you find what your looking for Ross....
Depends on the idividual Ross, there are men/women out there winning 50+ mile trail races in Talon 212s ...... some world champ level orienteers use these shoes for sprint distance qualifying events on tarmac courses!! ........
The stock laces are there thin and hard and cut into your fingers like cheese wire, ended up replacing them with something softer/thicker..
Have the shoes turned up yet Ross...??
btw, if you have any problems with there width then a very good option would be these :
yep, they turned up thanks not tried them running yet....that's for tomorrow...but they fit really nicely, wouldn't want them any bigger or smaller. feel tight getting them on but once on they fit like a glove.
they look like they'll really get the job done too, thanks very much for the recommendation! did a track session today....5x400m with 60secs rest each 400m in 70 (except 1 was 71 and the last 69) then 10mins rest/jog recovery and 5x200m each in 30/31. steady 10 miles on the muddy trails tomorrow!
Hope you enjoy todays muddy 10miler Ross, have a sneaky suspicion it`ll be anything but steadily paced...
Loving the X-talons really good grip in the mud and felt fine on the short tarmac sections (managed to cut overall tarmac/road down to just 0.6 miles on a 10.7 mile run). very hilly though as said so overall pace wasn't quick, something like 8min/mile, on a flat easy steady run i'm usually around 7:20-7:30/mile just to give you an idea.
they fit really nicely and really go offer great grip. i'm wondering whether to use this for future XC races instead of my XC spikes....any thoughts on that? i find XC spikes can bog up with mud rendering the spikes almost useless unless you have 12mm or 15mm spikes i guess.
good recommendation! day off tomorrow as i'm racing tuesday in a 4 miler....hoping for sub 23mins.
got 22:30 for the 4 mile race official time....though my watch had it at 4:01 miles and 4 miles was at 22:28 haha. also got a 5k pb on the way round as i went through there in 17:18, pretty pleased with that
I used fell shoes for xc before I got spikes - ok, but I prefer spikes. In thick mud, I think the Inovs will pick up more mud than spikes (think mine are 12mm). You're a good bit quicker than me mind
On order ...
I've just received a pair of Innov-8 Rocklite 315's - seem very good, lightweight and comfortable. Not yet run in them.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |