Hello, just got back into running after a 7 year break, I do it mainly to keep fit and I'm not really that bothered about racing.
After a few 3-4 mile runs and a couple of 7 milers over the last month, I went out on Saturday morning with the intention of doing about 8 miles at a nice steady pace, when I got to the 7 mile mark I was feeling fresh so I decided to see if I could continue out to 10. On e at the 10 mile mark I still felt ok and thought I may as well go for the half marathon distance and just kept going.
I finished in a time of 2h 08m 53 sec My average pace was 9:50 and the route took in 730ft of climbing. I was really pleased with myself even though I know it's not a particularly fast time, I've never ran that far before and had t set out with the intention of doing so.
My question is, can I now say I've ran a half marathon, or do running types generally only count organised races as half marathons and would say I've just done a training run?
Also I would now like to get a sub 2 hour time, how much extra training would be needed to knock 9 min of my time. If it helps I'm 44 and just under 14 stone. And before July had never ran more than 10k.
I guess you can say you've run a half marathon training run... For me though it has to be an organised event to really count... Will be interesting to see what others think...
"I ran" or "I've run". Yes.
I agree with above. I did this several years ago before I ran a HM just to see if I could. If you say you've run a HM it implies an organised event.
In terms of getting faster, what you did there is completely against normal recommendations. You should aim to increase by no more than 10% of miles at a time. You will benefit hugely just from running easy miles and time on feet. You will also probably find that if in a few months you entered a HM, race day adrenalin alone would get your time down a fair bit.
Yes, you can say you ran half marathon distance.
I think saying you have run "a" half marathon implies that it was an event. A small thing but that's what makes the difference IMO.
Thanks for the replies, in future I will not refer to my runs as "a" half marathon to avoid any confusion.
DT19, I agree that it wasn't the wisest of moves to run the extra distance and in future I shall increase the distance in smaller steps, it was just on that particular day I felt good and the miles just passed by easily. I'm not a fast runner and my 10k pace is around the 9 min per mile mark which isn't going to trouble any records but gives me plenty of scope for improvement.
Agree with Screamy!
Yes +1 for Screamy definition. I ran marathon distance many times; far more times than I have run a marathon.
" A properly organised race should have an accurately measured course (Garmins and the like don't count)" - not quite the case. Many ARC road and trail half marathons are gps measured
why would you want to say you had run one, only for someone to say "Only a training run then" do one it's not hard work then you're fine
Thinking about what Also-ran says, that's true. When you run 13 miles during marathon training you call it a "13 miler" not a half marathon.
You make a sort of mental note that you know you could run a half marathon if you wanted to but you don't think of the training run as such.
What happens if they ask which half marathon you ran? Now you know you can do the distance why not find a half to run
To be honest Cinders I'm not really that fussed about doing organised races, not sure why really it just doesn't appeal at the moment, though it may in future.
Im probably content enough to know that I have ran the distance and will now set my sights on improving my time to sub 2 and then maybe try for a 26.2 miler in the future.
I have signed up to a training plan on run keeper so that should keep me on the right track.
Are there many people on here who run but aren't bothered about competing in organised races? Or am I just odd.
I used to just run and not be bothered about competing in organised races, but at the time I also wasn't bothered in completing specific long distances in specific time goals either. That's more or less what racing is to me (plus beating other people, of course).
I would only say that if you can run half marathon or marathon distance and are putting in the time and effort to do it why wouldn't you do do a race and get the medal?
When you're 92, with arthritis and your running days are long behind you, they would be a nice thing to have don't you think?
In a race there's no obligation to "compete" against anyone but yourself.
What is it about organised races you think you wouldn't/don't like?
Hi Screamapillar, way back in 2006 I did the Blaydon Race (10k I think?) I did it last minute as a mate of mine tore his Achilles' tendon just before the run and asked me to take his number, I have to admit I did enjoy the day and whilst I'd never trouble any serious runners I came in mid table and was happy with that.
I think that I may have the wrong impression of races in that I immediately think that you race to win ( not much hope of that!) rather than competing against yourself in a more crowded arena.
Maybe I'll look at some HM that are less high profile than the GNR. From not interested in racing to I'll look at it in a handful of posts, how did that happen?!
If I ever raced to win then I'd never do a race
I go with what millsy says. A race gives a focus to train towards and a goal time. Very few people in races are actually in any contention for anything other than beating their own times.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |