chip timing

13 messages
29/10/2008 at 12:14
how come a chip time is different to the elapsed time
cougie    pirate
29/10/2008 at 12:23
Because not everyone can pass the start line at the exact moment the gun goes.
29/10/2008 at 12:25

is it always accurate? I was at the back of a run last week and prob took a min to cross the start line yet my results are exactly the same as the clock at the finish?

 that 1 min could have made the difference to my attempts at a sub 60 10k 

29/10/2008 at 12:28
Some chips record your time from the moment you cross the start line to the moment you cross the finish line.  Other chips record from the gun to the moment you cross the finish line.
cougie    pirate
29/10/2008 at 12:29
Mangofish - did they have a mat at the start ? Most do ?

If not - then you know what time you did - so relax ! Its common to time yourself on your watch anyway in races - as it can take aaaages to cross the line.
29/10/2008 at 12:30
My chip time at a recent half-marathon was within a second of my own watch timing. This was from my crossing the start line, not the gun. I can't see the latter is much use to runners, although I can see it helps the organisers.
29/10/2008 at 12:39
Chips in general I imagine help the organisers... nothing like the sight of a half dozen middle-aged women busily scribbling down numbers as you walk through the finishers maze.
29/10/2008 at 14:20

they had a matt which is why I was confused! but yep I know better about my time

OJO
29/10/2008 at 15:28

Eh? Enough of the middle-aged women. I've been known to be a results scribbler at at least one race where the chip timing was withdrawn at short notice (a sponsor withdrew). I'll have you know it's a job which requires a fair amount of concentration, attention to detail and civic-mindedness

I agree that gun to chip times are always spectacularly unhelpful for the runners, though useful for the organisers.

Edited: 29/10/2008 at 15:29
29/10/2008 at 16:10

Surely the scribbling at the finish line is to correlate finishing positions with gun times?  You can't get a chip time by scribbling!

But if the chips are recording gun times, then you shouldn't need scribblers at all.

The gun time is important to runners because it reflects the actual results, ie. who wins, comes second, etc.  Chip times mean nothing in that respect - they're just for your personal records.

OJO
29/10/2008 at 16:17

Of course you can't Chocolate Moose, when I last scribbled it was because there were no chips.

Chip timing is very useful for races with large fields. For those of us who are never going to be in the Top20, knowing how you've performed by your own standards and against your peers is good. You can queue forever to get over the line....

29/10/2008 at 20:08

Chip timing is a useful tool. It gives you an idea of your performance and where to stand in the line up.

Maybe it doesn't matter that much, but when running on trafficated roads you neither want to be stepping out into the path of passing vehicles or have too many runners stepping out to pass you.

It's also a bit of an ego boost when you improve your race position.

29/10/2008 at 20:15
It means you didn't wind you watch back an hour last weekend ...dah!

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
13 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums