Out and back just dont dut it no mo'
After 20 years of r*nning I am starting to find that I prefer doing a loop to an out and back course.
How about you?
[for dut read either cut or do]
Of course out and back has its advantages:
It is hard to get lost.
Then so does going loopy:
You don't see the same thing twice.
Feel free to start a couple of lists.
Out and back:
It is hard to get lost.It is easier to do an exact distance.
You don't see the same thing twice.You can be spontanious.
It is hard to get lost.It is easier to do an exact distance.Once you've run the 'out' part, you have no choice but to run back, thus eliminating potential laziness.
You don't see the same thing twice.You can be spontanious.You can run the loop a couple of times and you'll only pass the same point twice but if you run an out and back more than once people could potentially see you pass up to 4 times and think you've gone a bit bonkers.
I'm with marshalini, the lollipop route seems to suit me best
It is hard to get lost.It is easier to do an exact distance.it's easy to give up short of the planned distance by turning round early
You don't see the same thing twice.You can be spontanious.Once you're committed there might not be an option to shorten it if it's dreadful.
If you have the right loop, you can cut back to home any time you find it too much.
It is hard to get lost.It is easier to do an exact distance.it's easy to give up short of the planned distance by turning round earlyEvery half mile out will be a mile when you've finished.
You don't see the same thing twice.You can be spontanious.Once you're committed there might not be an option to shorten it if it's dreadful.A long loop is only a short straight line home.
Out and back's psychologically harder for me - you've run it once and felt ok, but second time around it feels sooo much harder because you're fatigued.
Loopdy loop for me anyday.
I'm loopy, me.
Actually, I do loops on loops so that I can add or remove them to run any number of distances.
Another vote for being loopy.
Lollipops are OK though.
Or getting dropped off somewhere and then running home.
Or out and back.
Oh heck, ANY kinda getting-out-there is good
Have I missed out on something? I only ever run loops! I once did an out-and-back race with nothing but a marshall stood where you had to turn round. It's never occured to me to run out and back really. If I like a loop and I fancy a change I'll run it in the opposite direction.
I'm now tempted to try an out-and-back - question, do you just get to a point and turn round? I'd be most likely to go up the old railway lines as they go on for miles and miles and are more scenic than running through town, so no road to cross over or anything.
Out and back means it is very tempting to cut it short, whereas once you are on a loop (or at least once you're more than half way round) you have to complete it.
So I try and do loops except where I really have no choice - like the other weekend where I was on a loop but from (seemingly) out of nowhere a dog appeared and started running with me. I couldn't tell which house it had come from, and there was no one around. It was early in the morning too on a Sunday, so I didn't fancy knocking on doors and getting people out of bed. The dog wouldn't leave me, so I just decided to turn my run into an out and back and hope that on the way back it would find its home. Thankfully it did, but not before he'd run about 6 miles with me. It was a sheepdog so had boundless energy, and I certainly enjoyed having a four-legged running partner
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |