New world record, and its slower than the old one?

1 message
24/09/2011 at 07:57

The IAAF, the international governing body of track and field and road-running, is now saying it will recognize women's road-race records only if they're set in "women's only" events, and the ruling apparently will be retroactive. Marks set under conditions that were approved and even lauded at the time will be treated as if they no longer count.
The new world record might not be Radcliffe's 2:15:25 from 2003 but the 2:17:42 she ran in London in 2005

Deena Kastor, whose 2:19:36 American record, set with pacing aid from men, may now be deprived of IAAF recognition,

 http://racingnews.runnersworld.com/2011/09/the-womens-world-record-dust-up-whats-your-opinion.html

Confused yet?


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
1 message
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums