Question about London marathon.

15 messages
20/06/2013 at 22:30

 

Hi,

 

What is the start like at London marathon? Can you get a clear run fom the outset?

I've got the option of a GFA place at London next year after running 3:04 at Manchester marathon in April. I'd really like to go for sub 3 in that race but I'm worried that I might get slowed down/ blocked at the start and not get the time.

To get sub 3 I'll need to run something like 1:28/ 1:32 as thats how my best marathon times have come, from slightly positve splits. I don't want to be in the position of needing a negative or even split.

 

Sorry for the ramble, but any advice would be appreciated.

Cheers

Gaz

 

20/06/2013 at 22:45
You will be fine as long as everything is the same as this yr.
You will get to start in the "fast good for age start" which is right at the front of the red start. No one will hold you up, if anything they went off a bit too fast.
You also get a better toilet to runner ratio.
20/06/2013 at 23:08

cheers Millsy.

21/06/2013 at 12:50

I ran a 6.05 first mile from the start of the GFA last time I ran it. As Millsy says, too fast if anything. 

21/06/2013 at 12:52
It's not called the "Testosterone" start for nothing.
21/06/2013 at 12:54
Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

I ran a 6.05 first mile from the start of the GFA last time I ran it. As Millsy says, too fast if anything. 

It's a good pace if you're aiming for 2:40!

21/06/2013 at 12:54

Yes, it caught me out. That was 4 or 5 years ago and the start was very hilly which felt a bit odd to do 3 miles of hills before joining the rest of the field in their flat course.

21/06/2013 at 12:56

Well it was a bit wird Phil. Might have been because of those hills at the start. Is it me or is the GFA start really hilly compared to the rest of the marathon?

21/06/2013 at 12:59

I've not run it during the marathon but I know the route as it's on my regular running patch.  Yes, there is a rise or two before you join the others.  I can't imagine it's worth a great deal of time, and you could argue that this is cancelled out by going net downhill into Woolwich, but I imagine it is marginally the slowest route.

21/06/2013 at 13:04
I think the red start is a bit hillier in the first couple of miles than the blue one.
cougie    pirate
21/06/2013 at 13:05
I'd not say it was hilly ? Unless you count the speed bumps as hills ?
21/06/2013 at 13:07

Was something like 6.05/7.00/6.30.....very off putting to get weird splits like that. Soon settled down after that into a regular pace. I'm usually like a metronome with my pacing. The year before we had the celebs in front of us and was held up nicely by Kate Lawler's arse and some Masai Warriors.

cougie    pirate
21/06/2013 at 13:08
I remember that. I nearly ran into a Masai spear.
21/06/2013 at 23:24

 Forget hills, there are no hills. 

Edited: 22/06/2013 at 09:07
25/06/2013 at 17:19

Just applied for GFA entry for london 2014, can anyone confirm that i'll get in as i ran 3.15.19 in london 2013 at the age of 49, but will be moving up into mv50 nine months before the event? anyone had experience of this?


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
15 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums