Anyone heard of this happening before?
there was a thread on here with some people moaning they didn't want their names on results lists!
Unless they're scamming the government and claiming disability allowance I'm not quite sure what their issue is!
Just enter as a hoax name if it's such a problem!
ps disclaimer...do not enter as a hoax name.
All the organisers needed to do was place a data protection disclaimer on entry as in signing this form you accept blah blah blah. Let's hope there's no race day photographer!
Weird one. They are freely available online through Runbritain etc so anyone wanting them could do so. Probably someone getting a bit confused.
Perhaps they don't need no-shit-sherlock and his sidekick trawling the results for massive time-related fraud, I mean, 2 people with the letter "r" in their name finishing within thirty minutes of each other, got to be a conspiracy.
Rather odd that they are the only race organisers who have decided that there is a DP issue. Have they done this for their other events? Would be nice if they responded to those of us who have e-mailed them on this subject.
i presume it wasn't a DP problem on the Sunday evening as you could look up anyone by surname or race number then.
in fairness those investigations are usually interesting.
where someone does 1 time miles faster than all their other times, yet people accept it and publicise it on their own sites!
If its on rb then they have breached dp anyway by processing and making available and processing data to a third party therefore they just as well publish.
Well my overall finish position in the marathon at Bournemouth was 1017 of 3001, if that's not giving away any state secrets!
What is quite funny is that if you go the marathon photos website and put in a bib number, you'll get a message which says "Congratulations [first name] on completing, with a finish time of: h:mms" along with the photos. And if you click on "Download your free finish certificate" you get the surname too
maybe they have had a cock up with the timing chips and don't want them to be looked at too closely......
eg their results compared to the photographs.
manchester had the timing chip cock up this year and then they sorted it out in a few days.........I am not convinced that they managed to do it thoroughly......just compared the duplicated times with some photos and adjust everyone who contacted them with their own timings..
and now I hear another marathgon has had a choip malfunction.
seems like its getting common and I wonder what the backup system for these races is.....
Many years since I ran 'The National' but when we finished we were given a numbered token which we handed in the other end of the finishing tunnel and a few days later a full results booklet was published. not much in the way of technology and 2,000 runners.
Robin Hood marathon and half marathon took over 10 days to publish the results. The provisional results were pulled off the web site very quickly, and then when they were republished as provisional results there were some glaring errors. (Ok really I'm more annoyed about this as I went from winning £50 in vouchers to ziltch )
Seems like there is a spate of races with glitches in chip timing.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |