training plan

5 messages
17/01/2010 at 20:07

hello all.

which is a better training schedule?

16 week plan or a 24 week plan, to run a marathon, or is down to personal preference?

thanks for any comments

17/01/2010 at 20:30

A 52 week plan is the best!  The more gradually you build up mileage / speed the more sustainable you'll find your training. 

18/01/2010 at 09:32

Thanks for the reply. Let me expand. I run 3-4 times a week and i`m going to be running the berlin marathon in September, this will be my first race, so, wanted to know which plan would be better.

Cheers

18/01/2010 at 09:45

I think there are two ways of looking at this.  On the one hand, the more time you have to prepare, the better.  On the other hand, if you're trying to stick to a training plan rigidly, i.e. looking up what sessions it tells you to do on a day to day basis, you may struggle for motivation to be this disciplined over a long period of time.

Personally I would go with something like a 16 - 18 week plan, but work up to it by getting into the general swing of the training pattern.  For example, if the plan starts by having you run 5x/wk, 25 miles per week with a long run of 10 miles, start to gradually build up from where you are now, over the course of a few weeks, so that you're more than covering each of these requirements.  Get into the habit of running certain key sessions on the same days of the week, e.g. a weekend long run, a week-day semi-long run, one faster session like a tempo run or hilly fartlek, and a couple of easy/recovery runs.  Schedule your rest days (or cross-training days) to fit in with the training plan.

An alternative might be to set an internediate goal, e.g. a half marathon around 3/4 months before the target marathon, and follow a separate HM training plan for this, then switch to the full mara plan when the time comes.  Chances are, at the peak of a HM plan you would be doing more mileage than necessary to start the mara schedule, but that's OK because you want to periodise your training with occasional cut-backs to give your body a chance to rest and regroup before building up again.

Edited: 18/01/2010 at 09:49
18/01/2010 at 09:47
Depends what you mean by 'better'. A 24 week plan is just a 16 week plan with a more gradual build up.

If you run steadily through the year with longish weekend runs, the shorter plan just ramps up the training towards the race. The longer schedules tend to assume you may not have not been maintaining a good base.

My running is hit and miss. I seem to have longish periods when I do little, hence I prefer a longer run in. I have tended to use Hal Higdon plans which are 18 weeks, though he does have extensions for people who need to build up a bit. Check out www.halhigdon.com to get an idea of some of the options.

Edited to add: good post from PhilPub
Edited: 18/01/2010 at 09:49

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
5 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums