Good for Age

Whats my target

1 to 20 of 80 messages
cougie    pirate
11/03/2008 at 15:30
Running London this year and hoping to do sub 3.15.

Now I'm 40 at the moment - but 41 this year.

IF I can run sub 3.15 - is that good enough for a GFA next year - assuming they dont move the goalposts ?

GFA for 18-40 for men is sub 3, but for 41 its sub 3.15.

Do they go from your age at the time of the race, or the age you will be at the end of the year ?
11/03/2008 at 15:32
no you have to be 41 and do a sub 3.15
11/03/2008 at 15:32
Run sub 3 you lazy sod
cougie    pirate
11/03/2008 at 15:51
<sobs>
11/03/2008 at 15:59
Lie about your age?
cougie    pirate
11/03/2008 at 16:00
Wilkie wins ! You're a genius !
11/03/2008 at 16:08
11/03/2008 at 16:54

Sorry to disagree - I am in exactly the same position as Cougie, and as I read the rules on the FLM website, you have to be of the stated age when the 2009 FLM race happens (ie 41), and your qualifying time must have been achieved in 2009 or 2008 (well, assuming the same criteria are rolled forward to next year). So a sub 3-15 race performance when you are aged 40 is OK, there is nothing in the rules to say you also had to be in the same age group when that qualifying race was run.

That's certainly what I am hoping for.

11/03/2008 at 17:09
Skip- I'm sorry but I think you are wrong. The qualifying time has to be achieved at the corresponding age e.g. running sub-3 as a 40 yr old or sub-3:15 as a 41 yr old. I don't think you can run sub-3:15 (but not sub-3) as a 40 year old then have a birthday and suddenly have achieved a GFA qualification. But to be sure give FLM a call.
11/03/2008 at 17:13
i might have been wrong but id make sure to cos you dont want to leave it till oct to apply then to be told "sorry your too young".   thats if the gfa system is the same after april with the online ballot thing
cougie    pirate
11/03/2008 at 17:15
I think its a bit vague to be honest ? Arent you in the age category that you'd be at the year end/start ? So people dont swap age categories half way through the year.

Certainly worth a go anyway - they can only tell ya to bugger off !
JPenno    pirate
11/03/2008 at 18:42
cougie - the flm and most races are based on your age on race day, not like triathlon where it age at a certain date like IM or end of the year like BTF.
11/03/2008 at 19:12

As an aside, arn't the gfa catagories abit ridiculous?

http://www.london-marathon.co.uk/site/?pageID=2&submenu=13&article=31

How can it be fair that a man of 60-64 has to run a faster time than an 18yr old woman?!

Next year I'm going to enter as a 65-69yr old, i'll be 35....!

11/03/2008 at 19:41
Kittenkat - so just run another marathon, get your quali time, sorted.
11/03/2008 at 19:57
..........do Paris!
11/03/2008 at 20:00
If I have a sex change when I'm 70........I can get in with a 6.30.
11/03/2008 at 20:05
If you can do IM, surely you can do sub 3.45?
cougie    pirate
11/03/2008 at 22:21
KK - you just need to do the time at any marathon. Doesnt have to be London.

And yeah, its a lot easier for girls to get a GFA I reckon. Still - all in all - I think its harder being a girl. Shaving legs ? Madnesss !
12/03/2008 at 09:52
It makes us more aerodynamic, Cougie
cougie    pirate
12/03/2008 at 09:53
Reckon it would save me 15 mins or so ?
1 to 20 of 80 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums