I did the race on the weekend, although some people said it had improved, i cannot imagine how it could have been worse. 12 runners in the Full marathon.
The full marathon was 2 x the half marathon course with an extra 3.1 km looped onto the end. Not sure why?
Nothing at the turnaround points other than a marshal sat in a car saying, "turn here" No mile markers or halfway point and lots of turns with no signage.
I appreciate the work of the volunteers who were happy to be there and the organisation and work needed to run a race like this but so many simple things could have been done to make it a good event. I'm not worried about numbers of people or medals etc, but at least an acknowledgement of finishing or running the correct distance would have made the effort worthwhile.
I'd do it again if it was an accurate course as its a good training run but for the same price as a city marathon, it was not a great value event. Did anyone else run it?