I would go for a second opinion elsewhere if you can? or a shoe/foot specialist who doesn't work for a running shop. I've always been put in stability shoes, and at a particular point when they changed versions I didn't get on with the new version, and basically had to bully the person in the shop to let me try others... i have a feeling that the fact I wanted to switch from the trainers that were £140 a pair to £90 a pair might have played a factor. Be aware that some brands don't consider that women in general weigh less than men, so even though they may need stability in the shoes, the materials can do with being a little less solid. [Incidentally I tried both pairs infront of a non=shoe shop foot specialist and she agreed with me that i ran much better in the cheaper ones that had less structure around them]
have u tried the wet foot test, to double check whether u need stability vs neutral?
I would try another specialist running store who can do a proper gait analysis, and I do think it is best to try and buy a shoe which is built on a women's last, because our biomechanics are different from male runners. However, sometimes a new type of shoe does feel weird at first and can take quite some getting used to, so if your gait analysis suggests you should be wearing a shoe with a bit more structure I would go with it but remember there are plenty of shoes to choose from, and they all offer varying levels of support.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |