I always thought Leeds finest were Soft Cell......Keir – loads of factors that say you would have been a minute or possibly even quicker than that. I think you might have underestimated the effects of the bug with your start and it’s very hard to hold it together once you overcook things. The fact that you ran close to 5k PB and still ran a decent pace over the second half shows you are in good general shape. How would you have felt about running another 5k after your 5k pb?prf – it seems you have had an enjoyable weekends racing, I know (Prince) SM enjoyed his tussle with you today as I am sure you did. Onwards and upwards!
As prf says, I had a very good day today, I have written up a longer report on the Middle Ground thread if anyone is interested, but the shortened version is I ran 35:24 today (35:21 on my watch!!!!)Mile splits were:5:43.8 5:49.8 5:56.6 Half way in 18:10 5:30.25:28.6 5:40.9 Last split was 1:11.3 or 4:59/m pace Second 5k in 17:14 (2 second PB!)That’s officially a 10k PB by 1:18.
Haha I nearly choked when I read that Keir. I think I will keep the 2:50 target just yet.....prf, what were you saying to me today about the marathon being about toughness as much as it's about fitness? Where as a 10k is near enough all a question of fitness as toughness doesnt really come into it that much.
YD - I didnt actually say that
What I said was that over 10K the fittest runner out of two will almost certainly finish ahead. However, when it comes to a marathon there are so many other factors that the fittest runner out of two could easily lose by 15 minutes if they dont get the 'thinking' part of it right.
Or something like that
That was it, you might have said something like 'many factors such as mental toughness', anyway it’s hard to concentrate on a convirsation when you are chasing a 2 year old round! What you said must have made an impression because I wanted to remember it I just couldn’t recall it exactly!
Must be a speedy 2 yr old! YD.
I turns out that pogoing in the mosh pit full of beery, sweaty 40-50yr old blokes 12hrs after a 10k isn't the best thing for recovery. Legs very stiff this morning!
Anyway, review of last week - first week I've been ill (apart from 2 days over Xmas) since early Nov - which is something of a winter record. Completed all planned runs apart from 14m with some 10m progressive stuff on Weds. But all paces easy - steady. Completed the week with 38.10 in a 10k, and ran round the course again afterwards to make 16m for the day. Effectively, although week 1 of the magic8 and being a 50 mile week, it has been a bit of a cut back week.
The plan for this week is ( / was - depends on what you think PRF):
Mon - 5m recovery (done at 9.05m/m)
Tue 12m @ 75%
Wed 8m inc 5k @ 10k pace
Thur 5m recovery
Fri 12M inc Progressive 10M (1.5m w/u 7m @7.15-6.45 then 6:15, 6:05, 5:50)
Sat 5m hilly easy
Sun Long run 20M - unfueled
I was thinking I could do with something to strengthen my quads up for the Marathon, I will have to get myself to a mosh pit for some of your patented pogoing x-training Keir As for the 2 year old, he can sense when his old man is tired and makes a break for it. Shows he has good racing instincts I suppose.Looks like a good week you have planned, I am planning an almost identical week; the only difference being I wont run the 3m @10k pace session, but I might do some hill repeats instead, depends on how the legs are feeling.
Keir - Yes, that weeks seems just about right. I'll be doing pretty much the same, although in a different order.
1. Instead of the progressive 10 miler, I'll be doing a progressive 10,000m track race with 4 miles beforehand.
2. The 5K will obviously be a parkrun
I may get two 20 milers in this week, one planned for Sunday and maybe one today if the legs feel up to it after completing 10.
Hi PRF - I've been reading the comments on this thread and also your blog about where you had to walk on one of your runs last week. You quoted "This is where experience comes in because I take this as a good sign, meaning that the total training load up to this point is right up at the top end of what I am able to tolerate and, as such, will lead to as much training benefit as possible without breaking down. That is as long as I keep an eye on potentially going into overtraining territory".
I had to walk on my LSR at the weekend - for a novice like me, how would I know if I was at the top end of what I can tolerate or if I was overtraining ? Cheers
Not got time to read back but just wanted to say well done to Y D. Brilliant time yesterday. Oh to run that fast.....
Carterusm - Good question but theres no great science involved.
The body constantly gives great feedback about what it wants/needs - most runners seem to assume there is 'something wrong' when the feedback from the body is along the lines of 'okay, you're doing great but can you just give me a bit of a breather to let me catch up'.
For marathon training, it is important to train on tired legs but that would normally mean paces being maybe 30-60 secs/mile down on what you might expect to run when fresh. Maybe a bit of a struggle at times but no problem with completing runs.
When getting into overtraining territory the body starts getting more assertive along the lines of 'look mister, when I said I needed to catch up I wasnt joking, so either back off or I'll ultimately have to make you do so'.
This can mean legs feeling very, very heavy and/or a strong demotivation to train. Dont fight it, just keep runs steady or have a rest day or two until normality returns.
But importantly, it doesnt mean that anything is wrong, it is the normal process of the training stress/training effect cycle.
The worst approach is being fixated on weekly mileage totals or having to religiously 'follow a schedule' above all else and ignoring the obvious signs given by the body.
Many runners will know instinctively where the line is and will build in cutback weeks in anticipation of needing to.Another mistake would be to never get anywhere near the overtraining line by being ultra cautious, doing so means depriving the body of the training it needs to give its best performance.
Well the legs did feel up to a 20 tonight but I ended up cutting it short at 18 because the pain of sharp hailstones on my face was just not worth enduring. Ouch.
So, 18.0 miles @ 8:19/mile
Very promising on the back of yesterday's 10K and last week's treacle treading. It flowed nicely, or at least it did until the hailstones started!
Carterusm - You shouldnt really have any problems with nutrition on long runs even if you run them in what we are calling an unfuelled state. You are trying to encourage fat burning and there is absolutely tons of the stuff. The only reason you would 'bonk' is if you're running the LSRs too quickly thereby burning glycogen too quickly.MP+ 90 or more should be safe territory.
The idea of the training effect is to get a higher proportion of fat into the fuel mix (you are always burning both fat and glycogen in some proportion, it isnt some kind of switch that triggers at a certain speed) thereby ekeing out the glycogen supplies further into the race.Steady starts are key to helping this conservation of glycogen.While you are training you are increasing the number and the size of each individual mitochondria, the power cells of your muscles, so you glycogen storage capacity is increasing.But, because you are training they are never properly full, that changes when you taper towards the marathon. So you should be stood on the start line packed with energy....and that is why lots of marathon runners go off too quickly, because they are feeling so energetic.Interesting that you're doing your long runs at a pace so close to your marathon target pace.
PRF - it wasnt intentional that I was running at 9:00. I'm trying to run on 'feel' rather than looking at my watch every few seconds. I still struggle at judging my pace which was meant to be 10:00 ! I guess I will have to use my watch until I can judge this better
Perhaps your target pace is too slow Carter. How did you decide upon it? Have you done a race recently to get a more accurate guide to your Marathon potential?
12m for me this morning, bang on 75% of HR Max (142bpm). Bit lucky really as I had mistakingly set the alarm for 6am and it was only one of the kids crying out at 5.25am which woke me and made me realise my error! 7.52m/m - 1hr 34min. Bitter cold wind and legs still tired from Sunday (impressed that you managed 18 PRF), butotherwise feel good.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |