VLM mile 6 discrepancy

anyone else?

7 messages
06/05/2011 at 15:35

meant to post this ages ago! I was using the balloon arches to time my mile splits and they were pretty consistent  apart from around Woolwich/Greenwich, the  first 10 splits were:

 1) 7:27
 2) 7:20
 3) 7:24
 4) 6:43
 5) 7:27
 6) 8:06
 7) 7:07
 8) 7:29
 9) 7:28
10) 7:28

Mile 4 was downhill so perhaps that could explain the faster time, but I don't recall being slow for mile 6 - mile 25 was the only other split over 7:33.

Did anyone else notice a discrepancy with the mile markers around the same time?

06/05/2011 at 16:09
a couple of the arches are quite a distance from the actual mile mark, best to time against the blue line in the road, there's a horizontal line across the blue line at the actual measured mile I think. That's what I used anyway. The downhill mile will certainly speed you up.
Cheerful Dave    pirate
07/05/2011 at 06:52
A few of the balloon arches were out by a few metres from the blue markers, but not by that much. Perhaps you pressed your lap button a bit late, as your seventh one is a bit quicker than 8 & 9, or maybe at the 10k mats?
07/05/2011 at 08:58
Mile 6 was massively out for me too, running 7.58 pace but it took me 8.43 to get from mile 5 marker to mile 6, I think the ballons must have been especially skewed. I'm not using manual lap next time.
11/05/2011 at 15:02

It was out for me too by pretty much the same as you simon. I clocked 8.06 for mile 6 and 7.06 for mile 7.  I knew it was out at the time as I was running pretty evenly at that point (miles 2-5 were all between 7.20 and 7.30, and I knew there was no way I'd run over 8 for the next one). So after I'd gone through mile 7 I just mentally adjusted the last two to say they were 7.30's on average.  Not worth worrying too much about to be honest.

Mind you I could have done with some of the later miles being shorter than they were .

11/05/2011 at 22:44
Yep, meant to reply ages ago to this but just checked and my Garmin measured mile 6 as 1.09 miles and 45 secs slower than I was averaging. It did throw me a bit to be honest - I can understand a tiny bit of inaccuracy with where they put the markers but that's not even close!
11/05/2011 at 22:52

Just checked and I had mile 6 as measuring 1.23 miles!! I don't think I missed the mile marker, but it looks like I must have, and then pressed it at the 10k mat instead. Shows how much attention I was paying to the Garmin on the day though, cos I hadn't even noticed! Mile 6 for me was thus a 7'43, despite running it at 6'17 pace! I think that shows I may as well have not worn it for all the notice I pad to it on the day


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
7 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums