Good running Cicero - the sub 40 can't be far away. Was that with an official pacer or just some guy you knew?
A friend. My coach in fact from the Running School in East Dulwich. I know some parkruns have pacers for certain times, but I'm guessing Dulwich isn't yet big enough. Typically just under a 100 runners. The Leamington parkrun sounds hard!
Running the 5 miler at sub 40 pace is a good plan - should give you a good idea of where you are currently.
Well it was a good plan ...
Which actually didn't come off as badly as I thought when, as I started, my watch didn't. Tried a couple of presses, but something was up. Probably user error. I've yet to go back to it and confirm that it does still work. So with no watch on and not being able to spot the mile markers I had little clue as to how I was running. (Event details state markers every mile, but I'm notoriously bad at noticing anything when running.) I'd planned to run 6:30 miles hence aiming for 32:30 which is a little outside 40:00 10k - 40:23 in fact. Reasoning here being that I currently feel that my next 10k attempt should be a more measured attempt at a good PB - 40:30ish - rather than an all out attempt at sub 40:00.
I asked a friendly looking runner what pace he was aiming for after about 500m and he said 6:20 so I thought I should let him go, but not too far. I lost track of him after about 3 miles, but take into account my comments about me noticing things
Not having my watch on it felt all but impossible to push towards my target pace. I just settled in and made myself uncomfortable. All I can say is I still had a little left at the end as I didn't see the finish coming up. (You know what I'm going to say.)
So, all in all, when the results were published I was actually quite pleased with a 33:11. Plenty of room for a PB next time anyway.
Edited: 04/12/2012 at 14:57