I am new to Runners World, so I thought I would post this question to hopefully a knowledgeable person.
I did a max hr test yesterday 2x3 mins, with the first 3 mins hard, then 2 min jog then the second all out! I actually could not run any harder as I was overcome with lactic, was actually slowing down dramatically!
Anyway my resting hr got as low as 36 last week, but my max was only 165. Can anyone tell me why my max is so low? I am 47 years old and consider myself very fit.
I did a bit of research on what would be the best way to test hr and most of the results say this. Maybe it is wrong, yes done a few 5-10k in my time
I have hill reps tommorow with the club and I am pretty much dead after that. I will see if there is any difference in my hr during this.
Thanks for the reply.
It doesn't matter whether your MHR is high or low. It's just a measure of your MHR. Some people have big hearts that beat slowly and some have small hearts that beat quickly.
If your RHR is 36 it suggets to me that you have a very big heart that beats slowly.
Use 165 as your max for now. Monitor it and wear your HRM in a 10k race. See what it says then.
It took me about 3 years of racing to find mine.
In my experience you are far more likely to hit MHR doing hill reps than anything involving running (or even racing) on the flat. But don't worry about the actual value of your mhr once you have it nailed. Mine is currently about 162 and has dropped quite a few beats this year but I'm running faster than I have for ages.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |