sfh legs,
I've been pondering about this for 15 mins now, and it's puzzling me... (it's getting late, and I'm not sure I'm following you...)
I'm only dabbling with concepts I hardly understand here, yet it seems to me what you say is true, but perhaps for the wrong reasons...
The shorter intervals you describe here would indeed improve your finishing kick, but perhaps only because, at these sorts of speeds, you're exercising a large proportion of fast twitch muscle fiber.
However, as a distance runner I still do this type of interval session, but for different purposes... I think, essentially, that the 2 different types of interval sessions you talk about exercise the same metabolic pathway (glycolysis), the main aim being to stress the buffering system of muscles, and to adapt them for continued performance at low pH levels. Recoveries seem short, only because muscle pH levels have not fallen dramatically.
Now, the interest of that type of intervals lies in that, as I have mentionned, they mobilise fast twitch fiber, which does play an important role not solely in sprints, but also in sustained efforts of say 5/10K/half-marathon (proportions of FT/ST muscle fiber for a 10K/Half-marathon runner would be somewhere around 50/50).