Welcome Bob Welcome farrochie (love the name)
farrochie sounds exciting ny recent long races apart from the 10km i guess a long time to prepare Some people do seem to do well on less mileage others not so we're all different
I'm a youngster here as well
Farrochie Stay around with this thread would be my first advice, as there is somereal knowledgeable runners who post.
Good morning and welcome to farrochie and Bob Depledge.
I'm the old boy of this thread and I don't really do much. The only advice I can give is "Hang about because there's a lot of running knowledge and wisdom on here".
5.09M; 1:06:47.4; 13:08/M; 3°C
That's typical of me at present though I have been faster, but I don't let it bother me. (As I keep telling myself)
Columba - No I didn't, I was simply late getting to bed.
When I did my marathons ('82, '83,'84, '85) I was very disciplined in my training and did plenty halfs, 10-milers and 10km (Joe Seeley 10km in Belfast gave me my best time of sub 38min). My performance improved significantly when I put in pyramid sessions on the track, along with the lsd of 22 miles on a Sunday; I always felt I should have done more of the 22s. I was also in a running club of like-minded people, so there was a big social element.
I have 2 runs (jogs) at the moment one around 5 km and the other just over 10km, both with hills (NE Scotland), and I'm running between 3 and 5 times a week. I find the 10km tough. Jumpers knee and achilles problems don't help. So now thinking about doing another marathon is more a motivational question for me, which I why I'll target 2014.
I've got a lot of back reading to do on this thread, but thanks for comments so far!
Good Morning,More snow and cold for me, so it will probably be another treadmill session at the gym today.
Bob and farrochie,Welcome to you both, it is always good to chat to other older runners.I am 66 and having been running since High School. I have always been relatively serious about my running, achieving a 32 min 10k in my 30s. I have only run 7 marathons and much prefer the half, where I PB'd at 1:17. Such times are long gone, of course, but I have gone under 1:40 for the half as a 60+.To achieve anything as a runner you must be consistent with your training and as you age that gets even more important. I think what form your training takes is very much an individual thing. I know for me I need to maintain at least 30 miles a week or I start to lose it, particularly endurance.
If I assume that you do not just want to survive a marathon, but actually race it getting the best time you can, then you need long runs as well as weekly mileage. You need to prepare your body to run for longer than 3 hours and the only way to do that is to run long.
When I turned 60 it was obvious to me that I was losing a lot of general body tone, despite running 30+ miles a week. I started an intense gym programme aimed at restoring upper body strength. This include Pilates and Tone-up classes as well as lots of weights. It took over 500 hours of gym work to restore my body tone and strength to levels I was at in my 40s, but I did do it.As ceal pointed out it is very draining so the first year was very tough and hard to maintain any sort of speed work as I would be falling asleep by 8.During this period I did injure my achilles badly and have struggled with it for a couple of years. I am now nearly fully recovered and once again back to 30+ miles a week and restoring speed and endurance reasonably quickly.There have been some huge benefits from the increased body strength but gaining 10lbs has not been one of them.
My advice to you both would be to maintain 30 miles a week if you can and work on increasing your overall body tone. The marathon is not a speed session and I think the need for speed work is modest. It is, in my view, more important to adapt your body so that it can handle a long period of hard work.
I would not follow a rigid schedule as you need flexibility to listen to your body and adapt your programme accordingly. This I have found is far more important in older runners than the general population for whom most schedules are designed.
Over the last 6 or 7 years I have collected a vast amount of personal running data as I passed through many training cycles, most focused on the half. I have detailed records of heart rates, cadence, pace, stride length for most forms of training, including tempos, intervals, fartleks, hills etc. I can now look at my performance on any training session and know with a high degree of confidence what training I need to improve my fitness to run a particular event.It sounds good, but it can be a bit demoralising when you compare a tempo run of 2 years ago with today's effort. If I can be of any help with any particular training type just post a question and I am sure you will get lots of answers.
Thanks, that's great advice and I recognise the length of time that will be needed. I've been doing 25-35 km per week, but will step that up to miles. You're right, I don't want to grind out a sub-6 hour marathon, but 4:30 would be acceptable, given my 3:13 pb.
One question. I have tried to increase my cadence to reduce heel strike but I feel that my stride has shortened to a shuffle. Any good exercises to increase stride length?
Bob, I couldn't agree more that spending time in the gym, especially as we get older, is the way to go as a supplement to running. I try to get to the gym every week, spending 75 minutes or so working on my core and legs.
farrochie, I've never done a marathon so can't offer advice on that. I hope it goes well for you. It sounds like you've had knee and achilles issues so staying free of injury will be especially important.
I had a very enjoyable New Years Day race yesterday, the Morpeth 11K. What a pleasure to run in sunshine after the last two very wet races. Another plus was that it was a single lap. The last 10K I did, and virtually all the local XC races, are over three laps. Not a great fan of keep passing the same place, but I know it often can't be helped.
There was quite a stiff wind though and it was fairly cold, about 5 degrees. It's a lovely countryside course, starting from Morpeth and running through the pretty village of Mitford. The first mile's fairly level, although into the wind yesterday, then a couple of miles virtually all gradually uphill, followed by a descent back into Morpeth to finish on the grass by the river.
I did the 6.7 miles in 47m 18s, an average pace of 7:04 minutes a mile. Reckon that equates to about 43m 40s for 10K, so more than pleased with that on a hilly course and windy day. I was 3rd M60 and got a £15 voucher. I stayed for the presentation and got a little buzz from walking up to get the prize.
I've been promoted from 3rd to 2nd place M60 in the Saltwell 10K from a couple of weeks ago. The winner has disappeared from the results. I can only think he's been disqualified. Any other theories? I'm 90% sure the same runner was 1st over-60 in yesterday's race but can't access the full results to confirm. His club's 200 miles away from the NE so he stood out.
Mile splits from yesterday reflect the gradient profile :-
6:57, 7:23, 7:18, 7:28, 6:32, 6:40
Great performance, Graham - well done! How nice to get a prize too, and be there to receive it. I can't think why a winner would disappear from the results unless something naughty had gone on either.
Welcome to Bob & farrochie. I too am an interloper on the thread, being 59 later this year, but as you have already seen, we have several people on this threrad who have excellent advice to give, which is why a number of us 'younger runners' are here (as well as the friendliness and encouragement that is in abundance). You have a nice long time to build back up, farrochie.
Having thought I would give marathons a complete miss this year, I have a friend at my running club who has asked if I'd be prepared to do one later in the year as a challenge with her. I'm seriously contemplating Bournemouth on October 6th now, as it's nice and local!
Hello and welcome Bob and farrouchie. I can't offer any advice, having never done a marathon (and if I did, would probably have to allow myself 6 hours for it). I didn't start running until my late 50s, getting on for 11 years ago now. There is lots of good advice to be had on this thread, - some of it you've already had, more will be forthcoming I'm sure.
Graham - congratulations on 3rd M60, you certainly deserved that prize and the "buzz" that went with it.
Impey - my brother walks like that Very Fast Walker you described. He has to slow down for me, or I have to trot to keep up.
That was a nice surprise for you get 2nd instead of 3rd. Maybe that other o/60 guy cheated somewhere or in some way !And....very well done in your Morpeth 11k, didn't sound an easy race but you ran superbly.
Columba,So it wasn't your brother who was doing those long strides where I ran then . I tell you what though I had to keep making a sneaky look back to make sure he wasn't about to overtake me !!
Bob and Farrochie,Welcome to our thread where as others have said you will get plenty of tips and support on here. Afraid I can't help much on marathon stuff, never done one at all !I am the second oldest on here having started my running interest when I was 63 just over 10 years ago. Not a fast runner but I do enjoy the occasional 10k race and certainly 5k parkrun events. Now just happy to stay fit and keep on running for as long as possible , taking part in races is a bonus.
Glad to get a nice dry day to try my first run in 2013. A little windy but certainly milder than of late.
Most of route was around the lake after warming up on muddy trail.Mile laps...11.35, 10.40, 10.26, 10.10, 10.49.For some strange reason the Garmin went dead in mile 4 but after pressing start button it soon came back on. Total mileage 5.2
Eventually got the results from yesterday's Morpeth 11K. The first M60 was the same runner whose name disappeared from the Saltwell 10K results, having been placed 1st M60 in that. Puzzling but I guess an open forum is not the place to speculate.
Lucky I kept going right to the line yesterday as the 4th M60 was only 10 seconds behind. He was 30 seconds ahead of me at Saltwell. I'd love to get to know the other M60s in the area but it's not easy.
Evening all. The cold bug has developed into a cough so I've avoided doing any training other than a bit of light walk/run, dog walks and some gardening.Off to see new grandaughter tomorrow.Welcome to the newcomers.I'm 72 with a lifetime of sport behind me but didn't start running until I was 55. I have a marathon PB of 3:53 done when I was 65. I started this thread years ago because of a lack of info on training for older runners and the situation has changed only marginally. There's quite a lot of info around but it's very personal because the rate of age degeneration is very variable and in this respect we are all at the mercy of our genes. However, it's a subject that could benefit from greater scientific research. Gym work helps but running fast races depends as always on quality shorter runs for shorter distances up to, say, 10k. If you want to run faster over longer distances you have to increase the mileage to build endurance. The limit for your training will depend on how quickly you can recover from each effort. The older you get the more recovery time you need. My 3:53 marathon was run off mainly 35 miles a week with some excursions over 40 mpw. My worst mistake a cpouple of years later was a 20 mile race 3 weeks before a marathon and I hadn't recovered properly.Mo's fast times result from high mileage. The extra gym work is needed to take off the final few seconds.Tracey Decent Park Run result. ImpeyYou clearly need to target a marathon before you get old.farrochieThe old man's shuffle is our worst enemy as we age. You can do a couple of things to avoid it. The first is to keep flexible with plenty of gentle stretching, particularly concentrating on the lower back and everything connected with the hips and pelvis. The second is to concentrate on running form and make sure you pull your heels back gently as you run. This will increase your stride length and improve your pace. Finally, make sure your arm action is OK. Work your arms and your legs will follow with improved cadence and stride length.GrahamGreat pace and excellent placing. Well done. The buzz at award ceremonies is a just reward for work put in. Enjoy!JJ
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |