Switching plans - enough time?

13 messages
23/01/2014 at 13:22

How do guys and gals?

I'm after a spot of advice. I am currently training for London and have been following an Asics 18 week online plan. It is only now that I have started to question the method after seeing a jump of LSR from 11m to 18.5m; and only 1 20+ LSR (at MP).

My question: Should I change to the RW plan with just over 12 weeks to go? I'm not sure if I'm confident in this plan anymore. 

Current levels:
10k: 48.22
HM: 1.45
Average weekly miles: 25-30

Thank you! 

 

 

23/01/2014 at 13:52

at 6 weeks i cant imagine the plans are too different, if theres a big increase in milage between the two maybe do it in stages over a few weeks until you catch up, otherwise i cant see it causing too many issues

cougie    pirate
23/01/2014 at 14:11
The Asics plans do seem very light on miles to me.
23/01/2014 at 14:28

A 20 miler at marathon pace?! 

23/01/2014 at 15:10
Yes wow 20 miles at marathon pace! How far out is that?
23/01/2014 at 15:14

3 weeks before race day, 22 miles at MP 

cougie    pirate
23/01/2014 at 15:24
ROFLOLOLOLOL ! Well good luck anyone following that plan.
23/01/2014 at 16:24

I used My Asics for a 10k plan with a good amount of success. When looking for a marathon plan I turned to Asics again, but I spotted those jumps in advance - And it turned me right off. 

The Asics plans seem to sacrifice milage for intensity. Advocating more miles at target pace.

I am now following the Bupa Intermediate plan, which was much more traditional with a gradual LSR mileage increase mixed with quanlity midweek sessions.

Personal choice of course, but I would switch provided  I was up to a similar LSR distance as the RW plan, or can make slight mods to play "Catch up".

23/01/2014 at 17:25

I wondered why the Asics 262 Paris winners use RW plans and not Asics plans. Question answered!

23/01/2014 at 18:19
The Asics plans confused me as well. As a bit of an experiment I had a look at what they'd reccomend for me to get from 2.58 to a 2.54 and the first thing I noticed was training 5 days instead of 6 and reducing mileage from well over 50 to just over 40.
I doubt there are many sub 2.55 runners doing 40 miles a week.
23/01/2014 at 18:24

Out of curiosity, why do any of you think that the difference in a plan actually means something?

23/01/2014 at 19:44

Jump ship. By no means too late.

I did the Pfitzinger and Douglas 12 week plan (from their book Advanced Marathoning)... quite intensive, up to 55 miles at its peak - although I was always a quite few miles short each week - but got a 14 minute PB.  It too doesn't have many 20 milers (2 I think) but you can throw an extra one in if you feel like it.   If you've been up to 25-30 miles already, then you're in a decent position to take it on. 

I'm sure there are others around.

cougie    pirate
24/01/2014 at 09:43
Ric - there are good plans and less so good plans. I don't see how that Asics plan is preparing people to their best condition.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
13 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums