That was appalling. There are literally hundreds of sensible, useful topics that could be covered but this is what is dished out.
Does everything have to be first grade paint by numbers?
I particularly liked...
The Sign: You abandon your race plan to pick off random rivals around youThe Solution: Focusing on the pack won't lead to better performance
I love how the whole concept of racing is totally ignored. You set your own pace and you'd better not even think about racing anyone else. Infantile.
If a dog and a pig mated, would their offspring be dig's or pog's?
Gives the impression the competitive and laissez-faire need fixing. Many will be perfetly happy just the way they are.
RW is running out of things to say. Subscription is threatened.
Rehashed old material full of contradictions; pointless for experienced runners, confusing for beginners.
You used the apostrophe incorrectly. Still. It was more interesting than the article.
I scored 57.
I didn't actually have to add or subtract any numbers, but they didn't specify a starting value, so i chose 57.
kittenkat wrote (see)
Training through injury doesn't make you any less competitive, it just makes you stupid, as does deliberately training with slower people, that's not being competitive that's lack of self esteem!
Translates as KK is so competitive it annoys her that answering truthfully means she doesn't score top marks
Sorry the LOL was to Lardarse
"I didn't actually have to add or subtract any numbers, but they didn't specify a starting value, so i chose 57."
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |