So to sum up, your complaints should be aimed at your fellow runners not the event organisers – I should state I do not have any involvement with the VLM and did run in it for the first time this year, but I think when complaining you need to be fair and think what can the organisers of such an event actually police.
For me it wasnt the congestion it was the act of one runner for me that ruined my day, he wasn't the only one though....
his act was to take a bottle and then drink, then throw it at his side (in the middle of the road) straight under my foot.... and consequently fell and rolled my ankle..... thankfully I was still able to finiah, as adrenaline and sheer bloodymindness got me through along with some strapping for St John guys.
Go back to cups and you dont the the issue of falls / ankles...
I heard stories on the day from friends in the crowd of bottles being thown overheads into the crowds... in one case into a disabled ladies lap....
Some runners need to have a little more consideration for others.....
Yes the congetion doesnt help either and for this reason and the bottles I will not be doing VLM again, instead find and support more local rural Marathons.....
I was both hugely impressed and slightly disappointed by the organisation of my first London (second ever) Marathon. I completed the Edinburgh Marathon in 2010 and was disgusted by the lack of organisation - no signposts at the start, nowhere near enough water stations, a worrying shortage of St John's Ambulance staff and a chaotic finishing area.
I am pleased to say London 2011 wasn't afflicted by any of these problems - there was plenty of water, the St John's Ambulance staff were both abundant and pro-active and although it was a long trek from the finish line to the meet and greet zone, it was logically laid out and effectively marshalled. And although I didn't personally witness the pedestrian crossing points in acton, my family members among the spectators marvelled at the effectiveness! Similarly, all the police officers and marshals I encountered were professional, encouraging and empathetic.
However, I found the course extremely congested and found myself becoming increasingly frustrated as the occasional walker at mile 5 became one of a hoard at mile 10. I feel a huge proportion of the participants responsible for my frustration were fundraisers rather than runners. It is admirable that people endure this physical challenge to raise money for worthy causes but it is more admirable when these individuals make the lifestyle changes and follow the rigorous training regime required to do justice to a marathon race number.
It is the responsibility of participants to judge whether they truly are fit enough to undertake the challenge that is a marathon and to move over to the side of the course should injury or illness slow them down, but I also think the organisers need to take greater action to enforce these recommendations. I'd like to see marshals taking pro-active measures to move slower runners and walkers over to the side but mostly, I'd like to see the field cut by a few thousand. Whilst I acknowledge this is unlikely and would cause disappointment for those who miss out and also reduce the amount of money raised for charity, I think it would vastly improve the race experience for RUNNERS looking to achieve a RUNNING goal. I
I achieved a PB of 3:51, knocking four minutes off my previous time, so I realise it's churlish to be disappointed. However, according to my GPS, I also ran 26.77 miles. That extra half a mile probably added 4, 5 or even 6 minutes to my time, whilst the numerous occasions when I had to slow down before darting between slower runners and walkers will have also taken it's toll on my time.
However, having said all of this, the magical feeling of being cheered over Tower Bridge and along Embankment, Birdcage Walk and the Mall is something I'll never forget.
Garmins are not accurate enough around built up areas esp around Canary Wharf... most peoples came out at around 26.5 / 26.6, so do not worry about that.... yes you would have ran a bit further due to crowds ect... but take it that you ran a dammed good PB, well done.
As somebody who did walk occassionally, you always make the effort to move to the side.
When I was running, rows of people across the road was deeply irritating and inconsiderate.
Unfortunatley, some of us picked up injuries during the first few miles, and HAD to slow to a run/jog or jog/walk, or jog/limp just to get round.
Comments about other people's speed, or lack of don't help if you don't KNOW why they are slow. Until I started limping visibly, there would have been no clue I was injured/struggling to anyone behind me. I trained for, aimed for, and really wanted to do 3h30, ended up 4h30+, due entirely to things beyond my control. I can run much faster than I did, put 3h45 on the form, eg slower than target time to be safe.
It's a shame the council didn't repair the hole in the road, my foot hasn't recovered yet.
Completely gutted with my performance, only held on for a finish as I Know how bad a dnf-at-big-event feels.
entered ballot for next year, feels like I have unfinished business....
If you are in it for a fast time, don't do London. Bloody simple really! It's obvious that 36000 runners are going to cause congestion so why are you even trying for a time?
PhilK wrote (see)
If it's you against the clock, look for another race - London is not going to be your ultimate PB course. Abingdon is supposed to be the best PB marathon course in the UK, from what I hear. RW publishes an annual list of the best PB courses in the UK.
For the vast majority of people (those not starting within 50m of the start line), congestion is going to be a problem and they will run slower than they possibly could.
For myself, after six times I'm done with London now: trail races and half marathon are so much more pleasant! (Oh, I have to admit, I did do my PB at a London Marathon, but only by starting near the front!).
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |