Run in smaller races that have less competitors and so cost less to organise and cost less to enter.
Those races often though are just that races, and so are less popular as a result.
There are more people who want to run than race.
Best learn to race.
It costs less.
£46 ??? My thoughts exactly! I did this 2 years ago and it was a really boring route even with the the odd pockets of music, that said I was willing to go for it again this year till I saw the cost. I have now decided to do the 16mile Kingston breakfast run which I did (shorter distance though) a few years back and really enjoyed!
There's no way I'd pay that sort of money to enter a race, but as Stephen says, it's not really a race - it's an 'event'.
Club-organised races are much better value, and often better organised.
World-class DJs? Is this a race or a disco?
And how long to you get to hear Calvin's mastery of the turntable? As long as it takes you to run past him? Do you slow down, to get better value for your money?
The fact that other races cost more doesn't make this one look any better to me!
There is a choice if you are willing to pay then go ahead and if you don't want to then don't simples....
I actually prefer the smaller ones but did do this one in it's second year I don't remember it being so expensive.
Calvin Harris actually played a set at the finish line last year - i did it with 2 mates and we had a little boogie with the rest of the crowd to warm down - it was absolutley brilliant!
Agree it's perhaps not to everyone's taste but was great for us as it was both my friend's first long run and if it wasn't for the music and atmosphere I don't think they'd have made it...
It's obvious to see why it's more expensive and i can second that the T-shirt is really nice too. It's not your conventional run but no need to slam it if it's not up your street - different things work for different people. For the record I LOVED IT!
It's a Rip Off at £46, Great North run is fast becoming the same.
I've just run the Rome Marathon for 36 Euros !!1
Helen Liz wrote (see)
Nice race choice, PhilPub. It's a good one. Probably is my local half.
Well.... each to their own and all that. If this type of thing is what some people are into, I wouldn't knock them for it. After all, if they all suddenly started turning up in droves at the smaller and cheaper races I prefer, I'd probably be a bit peeved.
But yes, some races just seem to cost waaaay too much. That's how I got into ultras this year, after comparing the £48 fee for a marathon with the £13 fee for a 33 miler and the £17 fee for a 40 miler.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Limited. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |