Before the rest of the forum wade in, this link to another forum helped me out no end understanding length and pace of tempo runs (the "tinman" parts). All you need to do is predict your 5km time if you have't done a recent race. "mcmillan running calculator" can be useful for this.
this was the bit I found most useful from it:
The mathematical correlates I used to derive the lactic acid levels (measured in mmols) I wrote about were as follows:5k pace divided by .93 = Lactate Threshold (4 mmol)5k pace divided by .90 = 3 mmol (half marathon pace, app.)5k pace divided by .87 = 2.5 mmol (marathon race pace)5k pace divided by .75 = 1 mmol (aerobic maintenance pace)
hope this helps.
From my own experience, which isn't massive I admit, I felt much stronger after running a few long tempo (45-55mins) during the winter. Made the transition to faster work much easier to tollerate. For a half mara I think they're essential.
Totally agree with increasing length of your tempo but not with dropping the pace, that just doesn't sound right to me. Surly dropping the pace is changing the " session " as in..... it would no longer fall into the tempo category therefore essentially you'd be doing a bunch of steady (or equivilent wording,lol) runs???
Have you a copy of Daniels Running Formula in there he writes about longer tempo runs but beyond the typical 20 minutes the pace will drop otherwise i'm sure if you keep to the same pace it will be like a race and you'll need more recovery time
longer tempo runs but at a slower pace
Rob Seaton wrote (see)
Rob, you're using the very narrow definition of a tempo run as being a lactate threshold tempo run. There are obvious limits to the distance you can run at this intensity (although a progressive plan may well involve increasing steadily from, say, 20 mins to 30 mins @ 10M pace) but 40 mins @ HMP or 60 mins @ MP are still tempo runs, with the tempo being that much slower. As far as terminology goes, any easier than this and you're into the category of 'steady' running I guess.
I definitely think longer tempo runs have a place in HM/Mara training plans and I also think they're useful in base training, i.e. they'd fit in at the more intense range of your Lydiard style aerobic running. You're running slightly sub-threshold so not building up too much lactic, but still provding a stimulus to increase threshold, and obviously get the body used to running at race pace (for the longer distances).
Sort of. To my mind providing a stimulus to threshold is just one benefit of tempo running, but you're gonna get different benefits depending on intensity/duration. Obviously the shorter tempo run is closer to your shorter race distances so, for example, you might do 20 mins @ between 10k and 10M speed (or 3 x 2M tempo intervals) to make your 10k speed feel more comfortable, whereas the longer sessions do more to develop speed endurance for HM/marathon. I guess ALD's link would have more scientific detail about the relationship between intensity and duration so I'll have a read when I feel like getting my head round it!
From a practical point of view I think it helps to think of overall effort as being the common factor in the session, i.e. whether I'm running 'fairly hard' for 25 minutes or for 45, I want to feel pleasantly beasted, without feeling like I've just run a race. So clearly different speeds will be involved.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |