One of the reasons I rarely take my time on runs that aren't sessions is to prevent the disappointment of some days being slower on the same routes. There's so many variables that it's best to just go and run the distance and not worry if a few sec/mile slower.
I'm certainly not complaining about mileage - did 61 miles this week which is not to be sniffed at. I think it may have been a combination of late nights this last week and a bit of stress recently.
Speaking of stress, I'm off to start revising again
Curly - it's a b*mmer when you feel like that, but I'm one that believes there's no point trying to carry on if feeling rubbish. I used to push on, but they were the days I spent injured more than I spent not!
TD - nice mileage. I'm around the same this week and really pleased as I've done a race plus 2 quality sessions.
I can also appreciate the revising 'stress' I'm in the process of completing 2 OU courses for a history degree and it's quite a juggle on top of work and training! What are you revising for?
Geography. I'm 2nd year currently so I need to get over 70% to get into honors. Throw in the fact I'm at St Andrews and there's a fair bit of pressure to succeed
Spare a thought for my mum. She's 51 and ran a 19:29 5k today...
Great time there by your mother Duckinator, hope she has passed the speedy genes onto you!
I gave up studying after passing all my profession related ones years ago, I had had enough by then as I seemed to have been studying forever! I am Chair of Governors at my kids school though which takes up an extraordinary amount of time, I have to be pretty disciplined with that otherwise it takes over somewhat. Although, it is SATs next week so that means they will be too busy to hassle me too much hopefully!
I had a nice run today. Just 60 minutes but it was off road and through the woods over hilly ground. This is the best I have felt after a marathon (apart from a sore knee) and I am wondering whether the 'softly, softly' approach fits me best, I have taken it very slowly this time but my legs are very strong. I need to do some speed work now I think after another week of steady running.
Mentally, I feel fresh and enthused about running too, usually I struggle with focus for months afterwards.
How does everyone else treat the initial weeks after racing a marathon?
Edit - how did BR get on today Hilly?
Generally if you don't have any runs / days / short periods where your easy paces get a bit slower and you feel more tired you could probably be doing a bit more training. Personally I'd be more concerned if I always felt great rather than if I didn't always feel great.
Being an old fart of course I haven't felt truly great for about 15 years apart from one day in 2001 before a road mile race.
TD - well done to your mum. Which 5k did she do?
I have to admit to rarely feeling great in training during training in the working week, although I do seem to feel much fresher on the weekends and can do back to back long runs if need be.
Beverley 10k was ok - 35:11. 3rd V40. Legs feeling quite heavy now after 4 races in the last week and a half. I'll ease back on the Weds race this week as it's just a case of posting a 30 min 5 miler to make sure the 2nd claim club wins the local league.
PRF / Curly - was the Hull Parkrun flat and did anyone Garmin it as the correct distance? Is it laps? Where do they meet afterwards?
Well done on the race BR - coming 3rd with heavy legs is a good sign!
Yes it is flat, cant possibly comment on length, its 2 laps and a little bit - some lovely sweeping corners in there. They open the cafe in the park specially for the runners - its nice
BR - Nice 10K there. That backs up the midweek 16:58 5K nicely.
Just think how quick you'll be if you cut back on the bacon sarnies.
'Did anyone Garmin the correct distance' - That delivered my first chuckle of the week!
Have to agree with Moraghan re the feeling tired thing. It should give a rather satisfying feeling to have to really slow down a steady run, it generally means that you've got some adaptation benefits on the way.
Duck, wow, that is an impressive time!
BR, a nice solid week.
Bacon sarnies with brown sauce, yum .
I am tired today (train was an hour late so only had about 7 hours sleep)...looking forward to my easy week consisting of:
10k tonight, 8 miles tues, 10 miles weds (with 4 at MP tempo), 10k Thurs and possible 10k Fri, parkrun sat and 16 miles on Sunday... so still big mileage but no interval session to help me recover from the first 5 weeks of hard stuff. Then after that I may re-work my paces for the rest of the plan depending on how tired I am.
7 hours - you lucky thing
Well done to your mum Duckinator!! Did you get your interest for running from her?
Well done Curly45 and parkrunfun on your wins.
Sue C having only done one marathon not much to tell. I followed the Hal Higdon post marathon schedule for intermediate runners, worked brilliantly, recovered quickly and had some nice pbs to follow.
Agree 7 hours sleep is luxury
Well done on the races BR, think I'd have heavy legs too!
Feeling bit better, took the decision not to do Halstead which wasn't easy Positives are, one of the reasons I decided to do a marathon was to give me an incentive to increase my mileage and the length of my long runs, achieved, plus no marathon recovery needed
Have looked at a couple of halfs coming up and will probably aim for one of these to give me an idea of where I'm at. Last proper race was end of last year, have done a few parkruns but not as full out efforts so am keen to get a proper marker.
Dickinator's Mom is quick!
7 hours sleep is something I only get with a Sunday morning lie-in. During the week that's almost impossible, not because the time isn't available, but because I simply don't seem to sleep that long. What I wouldn't give for Moraghan's 37 mins after lunch!
Didn't race on Sunday. Proved wise as whatever had been ailing me decided to leave my body that morning. I won't go any further on that one.
So can anyone answer the question as to whether it is time or distance that improves endurance? Slower runners who then run slow miles can't hope to equal the distance of faster runners running their slow miles across the same time. Slower runners, assuming they are simply less experienced, fit, trained, etc, should be able to make greater proportional gains than the faster runners. In order to close the gap most quickly, should the slower runners run for longer (not necessarily as far), or further (which in one run would be a lot longer!)?
Further would always seem to me to take too much time out of my life. But I do want to catch up with the quick guys!
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |