In my experience DOMS comes when you're either
a. undertrained or
b. well trained and well tapered to the point where you can thrash a race.
I have no DOMS from my 5 mile race the other night as I felt a little heavy legged before the start and although acquitting myself reasonably well (5:30 pace) this was not the top end of what I am capable of when 100% fresh or fit.
Hilly also has a tendency not to cool down properly or hydrate well after a race, and I think this increases the occurence of DOMS.
Moraghan - those times are from another planet. I reckon trying to average your 400m time for just 100m would be a tough call.
So what are the prospects looking like for the European medal now?
Hilly - Should be an interesting blog. Will keep having a nosey.
Another parkrun for me this morning, 4th at Finsbury, and happy with how the legs are starting to come back to life post marathon. I'm really looking forward to 11 weeks of faster stuff.
prf - very good chance in the 800m which I've now extended my trip to cover. 1500m I'm really not so sure. The Euro Masters are a weird meet from what I can tell - never know what the standard will be and it will also sound better than it actually is - but not sure what other champs an old git like me would go for!
Next weekend I am running the 800m then 1500m in the County Champs, which will give me a better idea of 1500m chances.
Worst case of DOMS I had was this years Brass Monkey where the majority of training I had done at that point was hilly off road routes. 13.1 miles of flat tarmac hurt! So, undertrained for that surface I guess.
Blimey Moraghan, in awe of those times!
Curly - Still in recovery phase, my sessions per week since Lochaber have been 0, 4 (this week), 5 and 6 in the next two weeks, building gradually in length too. I actually feel great and could do more I suspect. However, my last 4 marathons have totally wiped me out and this was the feedback I gave to Liz when we discussed recovery history in some depth prior to Lochaber so she will have set this phase using that information. Whether I feel great because I have been so conservative in recovery or whether I had a strong marathon I am not sure.
Edit - I read your blog, I have on occasion used the TPT routes, lovely. I use the Leeds Country Way a lot - equally nice for those off road, steady, 'good for the soul' runs!
I had DOMS after Silverstone Half - I also had to walk XC back to the B&B to get to the car though. I'd had a 2-week taper by then and I reckon I squeezed every last second out of that race - I couldn't have done it any better than I did.
Considering that you were ranked UK No6 V35 in 2009 and No.3 so far in 2010 for 800m, its not a bad base to have a crack at a European medal.
And I'm sure its just as impressive as it sounds, or at least more impressive than your 'out of the box' cake designs.
Very nice Mr Viper - on a flat course, I'm sure you'll blast it.
One day, we shall transcend to his level.
Well done Vipers - a hilly course is worth a lot more than 20 seconds so I think the sub 40 is coming...even if not next time, sometime soon no doubt!
I have no hope of ever being anywhere near Moraghan in times but then I am not cut out for short distances...10 miles is by far my favourite distance!
Well done, Viper, on beating Moraghan to the medals. (Having said that I got a nice shiny one for doing the bag lorry duties last week, I've heard they're going down well on ebay! ).
That sub 40:00 is a given now....
Promising blog there, TD... will read with interest.
Okay so todays LSR trialled another idea I am working on which is that energy drinks and water in your stomach are counterproductive (whatever the carb benefits) and particularly in me lead to painful stitches...
Anyway did 16.8 miles without liquid of any kind and the pace was fine but the last lap was a bit tougher than it has been previously - anyway it seems to be going well so far.
I wondered if others have/had experience on this and their thoughts -mainly I am doing it to avoid stiches/stomach cramps, but I also have a theory that not using sports drinks in training allows the body to adjust more to fat burning when tired.
Curly - yes it will train your body to burn more fat as a fuel. However it will take longer to recover from the run than if you had refuelled en route. It depends on what your objective is - if you have an important session you need to nail in 2 days I'd go for the fuelling option. If it's base building then the sans drinks.
FWIW I rarely drink on a long run as I can't be bothered and don't need to. But I should be mindful of the point I've just made!
Curly, snap! Due to how bad I felt at Blackpool and on recent LSR's, I had decided to try to get by on as little as I could in future. I don't drink energy drinks, just water, but would have previously taken probably 1-2 gels if running between 15-20, maybe 3 if doing 22, although in a marathon I'd aim for every 4-5 miles. To check if it was the gels, I used jelly babies in last week's 17 and didn't feel much better.
I'm not a big drinker anyway in training or races (can feel it sloshing around even if I have just a few sips), but I did my 16 today on no liquid or fuel of any kind and I felt fantastic. I aim to keep this up until I get closer to racing and then practice fuelling strategy in a few of my LSR's before the day.
What I have found that makes the biggest difference is refuelling immediately, like within 5 minutes of finishing. That's where the chocolate milk comes in handy and then eating within 20 minutes, sooner if possible. Not always practical though.
Nice one Viper, great run. I agree sub 40 should be yours on a flatter course.
Curly - I agree with BR and Kaysdee. I am unconvinced about the need to take on additional energy to fuel a LSR in itself. But if you decide to run your long runs without taking on fuel then you are likely to be significantly depleted by the end. That would concern me personally in terms of recovery for my Tuesday session and the possibilty of compromising an important workout. Also, depleting your carb stores will leave your immune system vulnerable for longer whilst it replenishes itself and therefore increase your risk of illness.
So, if I am running for longer than 90 minutes I will take a gel with me, over two hours gel(s) and drink. Not because I need it for the run but because of the above.
Its nice to see some agreement on the drinking/fuelling issue.
I stopped runnning for a while and when I started again it was as if I had woken up in a parallel universe. Reading some comments you would think people were in danger of dying if they had to run more than 2 miles without a drinks station.
For me, theres no need for drinks of any sort on training runs and that includes 25 milers, intense workouts etc etc. Hydration is what you do before and after a session not during.
I've certainly tried drinking on long runs but didnt notice any particular benefits. The only effect seems to be to make pee stops come into the equation, suggesting that the liquid was unwanted by the body anyway.... talk about ungrateful.
Regarding gels, again I've never taken one but am not convinced of any great benefit that cant be achieved by training. There were no gels about during the 70s/80s when much faster average times were being run and the very fast guys now dont seem to bother with them ... so I suspect theres a strong 'placebo' element to their supposed benefits. People report feeling a 'rush' when they've taken one but that would happen with any increase in blood sugar and doesnt necessarily mean that it has translated into increased muscle glycogen to enable someone to run longer.
The fact that a lot of people taking gels have training and racing paces that are pretty similar would suggest that they are not in danger of glycogen depletion anyway.
As a general rule, I would say it is always better to avoid introducing anything into the stomach during racing if at all possible. As soon as you do so, a certain amount of bloodflow will be diverted towards the stomach and away from the active muscles possibly leading to cramps and.or reduced muscle performance.
Thanks for all the comments guys - interesting - I always thought I was the only one who didnt enjoy drinks during running!
I'll take the refuelling on board but my theory is that once I've adapted to it then the recovery shouldnt be too bad - just a period of in betweeness that might hurt a little.
I won some gels and recovery powder a while back, sent the gels to a friend and the recover powder didnt seem to do anything tbh...
Mmmm....... I am no scientist but running a 16/18 miler with no fuel at all will reduce your carb stores which, however/whenever you replenish them, nevertheless will have to be replenished. Not sure I agree that your body will adapt in that capacity Curly and I think you would compromise your recovery for the next sesson.
Edit - It's the recovery aspect that bothers me, not the actual performance during the run.
Fair enough Sue - like I say I'm going to test the theory and see what happens - because I have 9 weeks till my race and the LSR isnt the key session I think I have a bit of time to play I feel fine this morning and am off out for a recovery jog shortly so I'll see how that goes.
I also had a look the other day on pubmed (I work for a medical journal so have access to research) for some non sponsored research and there was very little that would meet the requirements for Cochrane review - all small samples, mostly sponsored in some way and there were very few tests of drink against no drink because the partcipants know they arent drinking so may preducjice the outcome.
If anyone has any links to hand on published research on this subject then that would be good!
It was interesting how McMillan got a really tough press when he suggested doing long runs with no nutrition. Which was surprising considering the act of refuelling on training runs is itself a relatively new fangled idea.
But the whole point of LSRs is to train the body to use fat preferentially as a fuel source. You need to get the glycogen stores down low to 'encourage' fat metabolism to become more efficient.
Studies have shown that the most effective way to improve fat metabolism is to deplete glycogen reserves by a minimum of a third, ie about an hour of reasonably quick running, and then put in some intense efforts. Hence the widespread adoption of fast finish long runs, progressive long runs, long runs with races attached on the end etc.
If, and its a big if, gels do work as claimed, then they would reduce the benefit of such training. And if they dont work as claimed then theres no point in them anyway.
Most LSRs are done at a pace where glycogen depletion is not even a remote possibility so what is the refuelling for? It may as well be done after the session.
I'm all for adopting new ideas/training methods etc but I just dont see the benefits of all this hydration/refuelling stuff (except for the benefits to Lucozade of course - what a cynic I'm becoming )
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |