Is a half marathon measured in ''time'' or ''distance''?
I'm doing a combination of the two! I've been training for london marathon and was doing all mileage based. Then got an injury and the lack of miles was scary, so changed to a time based one instead.
I now run for the allocated time (up to 3 hours 15) and then after measure out how many miles it was. Sometimes that's helpful (i've run so much further than I thought I would and it was easy), sometimes it's been disheartening (I've run for so much longer but not covered as many miles and put in just as much effort).
I think it is personal choice and people can be very passionate about it. I also think it is about how technical you get with your running (i.e. are you a garmin freak/pace aware/heart rate aware etc).
Go with what feels good for you.
ah - But if you are running for around 2 hours, you know you can do it, whatever the distance you've covered.
The distance may be more than a half marathon depending on how fast you are, or short a couple + miles depending if you are slower.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |