time v distance, stop watch aversion

10 messages
21/10/2002 at 22:21
how many runners time their runs instead of counting the miles?

and is there anyone else like me who doesn't really bother with a stop watch at all? i just go on how I feel, though I roughly know how long each route will take according to my effort. but even when i go to the track i don't time the reps, even when i do loads. i could ask a family member to help time me, but i dont know if this is necessary, maybe i'll try once or twice just to ensure i keep an even pace.

has anyone achieved success this way or do i need to be more methodical? i've found i'm improving by just stepping up my training, but soon i realise i might have to start calculating things...
22/10/2002 at 00:05
Depends. I sometimes time the run and sometimes count the miles. Usually the latter, but sometimes (eg "20 minute tempo run") the former.

It's definitely worth timing your intervals.
22/10/2002 at 00:24
I have started running by time only on my long runs.I have been trying to ignore the distance and just keep going at a slow-steady pace.

I find that it helps me to keep my pace down. I have a tendancy to try and beat my previous time if I know the distance I am running.

I do however run to set distances on tempo and speed sessions.
22/10/2002 at 09:26
I never time steady runs because they should be ran how you are feeling at the time - I don't think you can gain much benefit from knowing these times.

I try to always time intervals, more to ensure even pace running than anything else. The nature of some runs, tempo/out and back etc, mean they have to be timed.

Even on the runs I do time I try not to get too hung up on the result - there are so many factors that can influence your training times, tiredness, time of day, weather etc etc etc

I would suggest you do what suits you - running is a very individual thing.
22/10/2002 at 09:45
I don't understand 'intervals' and 'reps'. Please explain!
22/10/2002 at 09:47
The good thing about using a watch (and a HRM come to that) is that sometimes its like running with a partner inasmuch that you tend to kick on occasionally. It's also important to guage development and at what pace to run a race. Finally if you following a varied schedule (tempo, recovery, etc) its important to know your optimum times. You've mentioned a couple of times that you tend to run alone so I'd certainly recommend buying a watch, preferably one that shows splits. I got an excellent Timex 30 lap Ironman for £24 from Argos. Still nice occasionally to leave it at home and go off-road but if you have a watch, its your choice.
22/10/2002 at 13:21
thanks for the advice everyone, i'm going to start timing the track intervals i do, since i'm serious about improving my race performance, and i sometimes feel like i don't even know my own potential at the current time.

i'm going to try running for time this afternoon for my speed endurance session, do 1, 2, 3, 4 min fast/slow then back down, like a pyramid session i'd do on the track, so i'll see how that goes!
22/10/2002 at 14:14
Good luck!..a change is often as good as a rest as they say
22/10/2002 at 18:57
Sassie, intervals are a type of speedwork you'll often see on schedules, usually marked confusingly as "Intervals: 8x800m" or something similar.

We can take 8x800m as an example. What that means is that the runner runs 800 metres fast followed by a slower recovery run - that fast-slow pair counting as one "rep" or repetition - then repeats that process seven more times. Therefore, "eight times 800m".

Of course, the unwritten catch is that "8x800m" doesn't mean "800m times eight" - it means "800m fast, times eight". So, if your recoveries were the same distance (a fairly common convention) you'd actually run 1600m times eight, in total.

For example, last Tuesday I ran an 8x400m session. I ran slowly to my local park (to warm up) and ran to a section which I knew was the appropriate length. Then, I ran the 400m to the other end fast, and jogged back to the start; ran to the other end fast, jogged back to the start... etc. After eight times of doing that I was more than a little knackered - intervals are nothing if not tiring!

Intervals are most often done in areas where you know what distance you're covering, which will mean either a track or a section of land that you know well.

Hope that helped :)
22/10/2002 at 21:17
Thank you. I got it now!

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
10 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums