Another wetsuit question

Buoyancy?

8 messages
12/02/2012 at 20:41

I've had a bit of a search on here but can't find the answer so could some of you please try and enlighten me.

I haven't open water swam as yet and will need to buy a wetsuit soon and that is something I am working on. Time seems to be running out until my first OW swim event in early May.

Question is this though

With the addition buoyancy that a suit provides it seems to be that swim times for people are slightly quicker. If this is the case by how much over a pool swim? Also would this be including the fact that in open water you do not get the benefit of a push off the wall every 25 metres?

How do people compare on time from, say for example, a 1 mile OW swim to the same distance in a pool?

Thanks,

Chilli

purpletrilady    pirate
12/02/2012 at 20:56
I think you will find that it varies. Lots of people are quicker with a wetsuit. I'm slower, I find it difficult to get a consistent rhythm in the Open Water. Partly because I panic but also because my legs are too high in the water because of the additional buoyancy.

If you are a swimmer that struggles from sinking legs then you probably will get some benefit, but don't forget there are lots of other factors to contend with open water. (like 1000 other people around you !) .

My best OW swim was 13 minutes slower than the pool equivalent.

12/02/2012 at 21:01

1000 people in the pond at AT will be a bit packed me thinks. The other one I'm in is only likely to have about 100 to 120 max I'd guess and it is in a big reservoir so hopefully that won't be too big a factor.

I get sinking legs the further I go so may this be of benefit then or can you end up just kicking into fresh air?

purpletrilady    pirate
12/02/2012 at 21:04
sorry I forgot that it was AT not Outlaw you were doing!

If you get sinky legs then you should get some benefit
m..eface    pirate
12/02/2012 at 21:10

I'm in the quicker in OW camp.

My IM swim (3800) is about the same pace I can do 1500 in the pool

Slowing for the wall, then touch turning and accelerating again can't be efficient for a big chap.Maybe if I could tumble turn efficiently I wouldn't lose as much.

Wetsuit helps body position in OW, no turns and drafts a plenty all help on an OW swim. No panicing from me in OW.

The top end suits reduce bouancy for the better swimmers so if you are a less competent swimmer the lower priced suits are often better suited. Fit is everything, try them on, try multiple types, one of the stores (TriUK?) has an endless pool to allow you to try swimming in them. Failing that you could wait till the summer and then try them at a lake - a few will loan/hire suits for tests and ensure you get the right fit. If money is tight then it may be worth trying some on and trying to pick up a bargain.

 

M.eface

13/02/2012 at 22:56

@PurpleTriLady - my first suit was a cheapo Foor one and I found it too buoyant in the legs causing me back pain (eventually I realised this..).  My next one was one with far less leg buoyancy and I've found it much much better.  May be worth trying some others. 

Bouncing Barlist    pirate
13/02/2012 at 23:14

I agree that the difference a wetsuit makes varies but for comparitive purposes I did 2 Ironman races in 2010 2 weeks apart.

The first (IM Germany) was non wetsuit swim due to lake temperature, my time was 1.43.08.

The second (Challenge Roth) I swam in a wetsuit and my time was 1.21.08

So for me im pretty sure a wetsuit makes me 15-20 minutes faster in open water when compared to not wearing one.  in nearly all the other Ironman swims ive done with a wetsuit my times have been in the range of 1.15-1.25, ive done one other non wetsuit ironman swim in 2007 and my time was 1.50 something.

If I was to swim 3800 meters in a 25 metre pool without a wetuit but with the benefit of push off then id hazard a guess my time would be around 1.30?

I think what you gain with the buoyancy of a wetsuit more than makes up for not having a wall to push off.  One of the other factors in Open Water is that you can draft, even if youre not an accumplished drafter, you can still get a pull as being part of a bigger pack of people i.e. your in a body of water moving in a certain direction.

One other thing to consider is that swimming without a wetsuit is more tiring as your legs drop more, that means you either need to kick more or work harder for a given speed.

Bouncing Barlist    pirate
13/02/2012 at 23:22
m.eface wrote (see)

The top end suits reduce bouancy for the better swimmers so if you are a less competent swimmer the lower priced suits are often better suited. Fit is everything, try them on, try multiple types, one of the stores (TriUK?) has an endless pool to allow you to try swimming in them. Failing that you could wait till the summer and then try them at a lake - a few will loan/hire suits for tests and ensure you get the right fit. If money is tight then it may be worth trying some on and trying to pick up a bargain. 


I agree top end suits can have less buoyancy but its not the case with all top end suits per se.  A few years ago I changed from a bottom end ex hire suit to a Blue Seventy Helix, the latter being pretty much the top rated suit by most reviews.  I found the new Helix noticibly quicker and less tiring. 

Top end suits as well as the 'gimiks' such as catch panets are a lot more flexible, especially around the arms and shoulders which makes them less tiring.

As said, the most important thing is having a wetsuit which suits your own swim style and buoyancy and that fits properly.  If you have the money to spend I (and many others I know) rate the Helix extremely highly.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
8 messages
Forum Jump  

RW Forums