im not offended by KK's remarks at all. in fact i kind of agree with the longer isnt better attitude.
If KK remembers i even said at the outlaw that I was actually going to concentrate on going shorter and faster in 2013, This is still going to happen, I think it is well in my ability do sprint distance well and still chug around long distance without being the last one home or have to chase cutoffs.
I mean no offence to people that did the outlaw at close to cut off times but in all honesty i found it quite easy, yes my time was utter crap from what i wanted, i was after a sub 12 and got a 12:46, i learned alot about my nutrition on the bike - or lack of - on the day and wont make them same mistakes, drinking with GB the night before wasnt the best idea either. my mara fell apart and i finished up walking it and still made a sub 13. I was so pissed off with myself that when i got home i signed up for a self imposed arse kicking by entering the grimreaper ultra 70 miler, as the facebook mob will know
. i only ever done 1 marathon before and the outlaw run but i know i beat a few of the ultra guys that had a lot more experience than me just 12 days after doing the outlaw. I seem to be equipped for long distance better than i thought.
So its with these findings that i find myself torn between
1 - i would love to dedicate more time to improving at shorter distances knowing that i can improve a lot on my middle of the pack placings
2 - i would love to go long - really long, and not at a slugs pace, my finish place in the grim was in the top 25% with no relevant training
this is why i agree with KK - for me being fast (for an fattie forty year old) is a prime objective, im dont want to chase cut offs, i just want the opportunity to get better and place higher in the type of distance im most suited. 
if you read all that you must be bored to death, and for that im sorry