Kona

I think iun Schmunk's ordered world it would go as follows

Sector Distance, Sector Time, Overall Distance, Overall Time
or
Sector Distance, Overall Distance, Sector Time, Overall Time

not

Overall Distance, Sector Distance, Sector Time, Overall Time

CDO not OCD

Should start speeding up once he makes the turn

Oh FFS

Sector: 15.3 mi   51:56       17.68 mi/h
Overall 60.5 mi   4:05:09     21.04mi/h

First male pro has gone through T2 - Marion Vanhoenacker. 

Sector: 14.8 mi   00:35:47    24.82 mi/h
Overall 75.3 mi   03:28:20    21.69mi/h

Total Time 04:40:56

Marino sorry..

Faris is still in the budgie smugglers!

Got to call it a night

GO ROSEY!!

I've been on Rosey's blog - I am once again inspired! Amazing.

Bah - I need to sort something out. My wife wouldn't let me go out for my long bike ride today as she wanted me to look after the twins Oh well - one step at a time - i'm getting all my running in. Long slow run tomorrow night.

With a quick comparison against Vanhoenacker for all but the last two segements vs Rosey would see Rosey come off the bike in 05:18:44. Although would expect an age grouper to tire more in the last parts of a bike leg compared to the leading Pro.

"First male pro has gone through T2 - Marino Vanhoenacker."

He overtook me on the bike once, well I say overtook, lapped would be slightly more accurate 

For clarification I have used a linear progression from 75.3 split and have not done a non-linear regression to asses if there is any deviation from a linear relationship for each split done so far.

Although just eyeballed relationship between sector speeds and  it looks pretty linear apart from 2nd sector (2.1miles) where Rosey smashed it achieving 0.91 of Vanhoenacker's speed. Average is 0.84.

This thread is missing pie charts and graphs...

I agree - is there a function for that?