Pre-requisite for IM - discuss

41 to 60 of 95 messages
AndrewSmith    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:47

So TH2 along those lines what sort of events/courses whould you ban disabled athletes from? It is the same reasoning that had women banned from the Boston marathon until 1968!!

Enjoyment takes many forms and to just be in a certain place doing a certain thing is for some people the only reason to do it and is as valid a reason as any.

The trouble is always that when someone is very good at something, ley people assume they actually know what they are talking about and that everything they say is a gospel truth.

Edited: 19/06/2008 at 16:49
PloddingOn    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:48

Seriously now - what's your IM time then TH2? 

*hops up and down*

seren nos    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:50
what does he say about cyccling times and swimming times...........................surely if your going to give a suitable run time he should also be aiming at certain times for the other disciplines or does he just count those as the easy legs that anyone can do
sluggie    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:51

If we take what Mr Lothar says literally re completing  it must surely be nonsense - I wonder what proportion of Pirate IM finishers meet his recommended mara times? Of course, it may lose something in translation - perhaps he meant compete rather than complete

 Re the 'take part and survive' culture, I am proud to be part of it (maras, ultras, cross-country ski maras...crap at all of them, made the cut-offs and lived to tell the tale!). Agree that some of us will never get that much faster with training, but are  good at plodding on and keeping a positive attitude. High boredom threshold helps!

Still deliberating whether I could actually survive the cut offs for IM (4.30 mara pb!) but will probably try middle distance at least. Re 'the IM will always be there' - well, yes it will, but some of us are so middle-aged that there is a bit of 'now or never' mentality about getting round to it before the old bod gives out completely!

I wonder how Lother does his calculation. FB suggests 5x your Oly  time...

 In running I apply the Paula principle (take her time and double it to estimate mine). Spot on for my mara time. However, if I apply it to Chrissie Wellington's world record IM time that gives me 18 hours for IM which is not so encouraging...

19/06/2008 at 16:53

What was the reason that women were banned from Boston until 68? I had always thought it was because "they" (whoever they were) assumed women couldn't safely run long distances.

Smithy I'm not sure anyone here is saying that this chap's comments are gospel truth. I think they are just trying to encourage debate.

However, it's always going to be difficult to debate something like this reasonably on a forum which, by its very nature, celebrates those who "just give it a go".  

AndrewSmith    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:54

TH2 you are missing one very big point and that is it is not always about the score or the time. A challenge is as individual as the person, you cannot say what would be a bigger challenge for someone because you are not them and cannot know what is important to that individual.

19/06/2008 at 16:54
LOL Sluggie - love the Paula Principle!
PloddingOn    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:55

Sorry - plagarism here for a bit:

"It is not the critic who counts, nor the man who points how the strong man stumbled or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly...who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at best, knows the triumph of high achievement; and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat."

AndrewSmith    pirate
19/06/2008 at 16:59
I was generalising over the way people follow blindly the words of others without looking into the facts to check for themselves.
19/06/2008 at 17:00

Plooding On - I am not sure if this question has a -ve implication or not?

But the answer is I have never completed an IM. And the reason is a very personal one. For me to take the challenge on, I would want to reach a (personal) level of achievement that would make sense. This would be very different from an elite athlete and from someone who is happy to walk around the run course. BUT that is not the point. My goals will be different from anyone else's. As I say, each to their own. I applaud anyone who takes on their own challenge whatever that may be. It could be a 16hour IM, it could be to do a <1hr sprint. This year, I have gone long with ultra marathon's (2 x 56 miles and 1 x 100miles). These are great challenges. Next year, I am trying to decide whether to stay long or to go back to trying to achieve faster times over shorter (eg. 10k runs, Oly tris etc). I am trying to work out which would be the bigger challenge for me personally.

But, my personal thinking is that Leder's point is relevant. I think there is an argument that if you cant run a <4hr mara then perhaps a shorter distance is more suitable. Hence it might be worth reading what Leder has to say. But that doesn't mean that I would not encourage anyone to take on the incredible challenge of an IM if their personal goal was different.

19/06/2008 at 17:09

AS - on the contrary. I fully accept that each person should have their own goals and that we should celebrate the diversity of those goals. I am not an elite athlete by any measure. I compete to (1) have fun and (2) to challenge my own goals.

To run an ultra, I needed to adopt a run/walk stragegy. Others ran the whole distance. Others walked most of it having run to fast to start with. So what? The point is that if the length of the ultra was such that I would need to walk the event, then for ME PERSONALLY, the challenge would not be the correct one. I would select a shorter event simply because there comes a point at which finishing for finishing's sake ceases to have sufficient appeal. But what drives you and anyone else will be different.

But maybe (??) by reading what Leder ACTUALLY says we can each consider our goals in this context and then make our decisions. If the answer is go for it- Great. If the answer is maybe I would be better of running a shorter event/tackling an easier ski run - equally great.

I am simply trying to address the assymetry in the responses to UW original question. No intention of criticising anyone else's goals or acheivements.

19/06/2008 at 17:14

Plodding On - to follow on from your quote (which I agree with to an extent), I was a climber in my youth. I was always taught that a good mountaineer was the person who knew when to turn back. So I was impressed by Fiennes decision not to 'finish' his attempt on Everest but to understand his personal limits. In climbing today, this common sense, has been overtaken by a desire to achieve goals that are beyond sensible limits. Witness the sad events on Everest over the past few years.

To take the quote to its logical end- we would also celebrate the Charge of the Light Brigade. Oh, yes we do!

19/06/2008 at 17:22
It's not Leder's point though!  He's not talking about "completing in a good time".  He thinks you need to be able to do that in order to finish.  FINISH.  He's mistaken.  No biggy.  Being fast at running doesn't mean that you can't talk out of your arse.  Even about running related matters.
sluggie    pirate
19/06/2008 at 17:23

Not sure about the idea that doing a shorter distance and aiming for a faster time actually works for everyone in the world of us back-of-the pack folks. I've trained my socks off and never managed to shave more than 30 mins off my original mara time (I've done half-a-dozen now at least). On the other hand, I can plod round ultras reasonably happily at not much slower than my mara pace.

Doesn't mean that I should necessarily do IM, but it does make me think that  going longer not faster  is  weirdly actually a more achievable challenge for some of us slower peeps, though the sheer number of hours training to cover the rquired distances is so much more than the speedy types!

19/06/2008 at 17:28
If you go to the ironman france site and click on the voting link, you might see why Leder gets such short shrift.

"What is your goal on the Ironman France?

Enjoy the race, the landscapes and cross the Finishline
19/06/2008 at 17:30

Candy - if he is (after translating) saying that to 'finish' an IM you must be able to run a 3-4hour marathon, then clearly he is talking rubbish. But let's be sensible here. The evidence is obvious that there is no such criteria/threshold. He has a brain and he knows it as well as the rest of us. So I suggest that he means something different by the term 'finish'. I would like to know exactly what he does mean, that's all.

19/06/2008 at 17:35

>> then to celebrate what is basically pretty poor performance but dress it up as an 'admirable finish'.

A poor performance by whose standards? By his standards virtually the entire human race is unable to achieve a good performance so should they not try at all?

Surely it is the standards of each individual competator that matter here.

Edited: 19/06/2008 at 17:35
19/06/2008 at 17:50

 "Surely it is the standards of each individual competator that matter here."

Exactly, and if you read all the posts (including mine) everyone is agreeing on that point.  I would like to understant EXACTLY what standards Leder has, what the context of his book is and what he means by 'FINISH'. Because, its blindingly obvious that he doesn't just mean get across the finish line. He just may (?) have a serious point that could be worth considering.

However, if the mere mention of a debate (caveated throughout by the point that everyone will have their own goals and challenges and that these should all be celebrated) touches so many raw nerves, the  perhaps we should leave it there.

I was only bored, and knew what the reaction would be.

BTW  - I genuinely respect anyone who takes on the IM challenge whatever their time and ability. In the same way, I respect the person who takes on a super sprint. Every one is in the small minority of folk who are prepared to get off their backsides and challenge themselves. And for that, I salute them!

19/06/2008 at 18:01
  ][ 19.05.08
Team-Erdinger Alkoholfrei Meeting in Garmisch-Partenkirchen

At least they understand nutrition!
19/06/2008 at 18:02

It's something we've possibly all pondered at one point or another. I know I'm in no danger of doing a 30 min 10k, or a 2'30 marathon any time soon. But that doesn't mean I should stop running. I challenge myself, I want to get this time for a 10k, or I want to run this far, or have the experience of completing this event... I hope to do an IM one day, but not yet. For me, my mara time is within those limits, but I'm not a strong cyclist, and although I like swimming I don't have much endurance and I'm not very fast, so I imagine overall I'd not be anywhere near the front of an IM.

To me one of the exciting things with running (and this may be true in the tri world, esp at IM distance) is that I can enter a race alongside the world's greats. If you do one of the bigger marathons, Paula, or Haile, or whoever might be there at the front... If someone has done a 5 hr marathon, or a 16hr IM, or even a 1'15 10k, they have the achievement of having *done* it all, which is surely better than not doing it. Whether they should make themselves try to get faster is up to them. For some the challenge is to push a 10k time under an hour, or under 45 mins, for some it's to run further than they have before. Personally, although I enjoy a bit of speed work, I don't really like short races enough to focus on, say, getting a great 5k time before running further. If it was my job, then perhaps I would, but if it's for fun then your goals and your achievements are what you decide them to be.

I suppose it's down to how you take the original statement. If he means compete rather than complete, then fine. But if he's just mistaken with figures then that's less heinous than saying slower peeps shouldn't enter at all... But I think we're all sort of saying the same thing, in that what it's 'worth' you doing depends on what you want, so if you only want to enter if you can compete at that distance then fine, but if your goal is to enjoy/complete then fine. I hope the competers don't preclude the completers!

41 to 60 of 95 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums