Lemony: glad my update was useful; yours sound like it would be also. I don't see myself getting near the path again before the race: the train tickets cost a fortune, for one thing, and I've got Winter Tanners next weekend
Sounds like you're doing some great running. My legs were a bit tired today, but I had run a 5+ mile cross-country race yesterday and a speed technique session on Thursday. I could have kept going today, but not quickly. I'm intending to fit in 10 miles tomorrow morning before work, so I'll see how that goes.
thanks for the update Debra. very useful
Anyone doing Hebden Bridge this weekend? Gets my trail running practice in and 3500-4000 ft hills, plus test kit out, also likely 0 degrees or colder plus snow...
Half marathon at steady pace the next day.
Fit-Running-Cat. You're welcome. No, I've got Winter Tanners this weekend - 30 miles, following directions, so it won't be fast, but should be good for time-on-feet. Good luck at Hebden Bridge.
Another vote of thanks Debra, esp for the navigation tips too. I saw on a previous thread that they sometimes pair runners towards dusk. May be good!!
Am umming and aahing re softshell vs active goretex for windproof trousers.
Have long miserable weekend at work coming up, but looking forward to 28/12 or 30/15 Monday/Tues, although slightly concerned that it's too close, and that I should be tapering already. The plan I downloaded from ultrarunningladies suggests tapering from 14th. Oh dear, oh dear.......
Route report - Oxford to Culham
I ran this part of the route in reverse order as the snow was starting to fall first thing this morning. The ground was semi-frozen, meaning that those places where it was reasonably dry to start with were generally easy to run on, although some sections with uneven ground were quite difficult. In a number of places there were still muddy patches, not all of them obvious as they were covered with a thin layer of ice and snow. This meant that I broke through the ice into a muddy muddle on a fairly frequent basis. This was only a problem on the odd occassion where there was a particularly large puddle and I suspect that these will become pretty obvious once the lead runners have gone through (assuming it is still snowy). However, I would stress that much of this part of the route is still very muddy, with no-where for the water currently falling as snow to go. Most of it will be OK to run if the weather stays freezing for the next couple of weeks. But if it warms up for a few days before the race, it will be very muddy and slippy. Either way, I would recommend off-road shoes with some grip. I fell over twice this morning: once on a muddy slope where I was trying to avoid a deep puddle; and a second time on some uneven frozen ground. I also ended up running a total of 13.4 miles at an average 10:15 min/mile pace, despite around 4 miles of this being on road or hard towpath (a bit each at the beginning and end, mostly off the course). My usual easy off-road running pace is around 8:45 min/mile so I'm going to revise my expectations for this race accordingly.
A few detailed points to note:
1) Iffley Lock (right at the start) is undergoing construction work and there's a narrow temporary bridge across it with no overtaking room. If you're planning to be one of the faster runners, you'll need to get yourself at the front from the start or expect a bit of a queue to get across.
2) Once off the cycle path (about 1.5 miles from the race start) is now easier to run than when I last tried in November (when it was flooded before the rest of the Thames Path). But there is still a lot of standing water and if heavy snow melts over it just before race day, you will get wet feet here.
3) The path from then on until about 1 mile after the Radley Boathouse is relatively OK (subject, as noted above, to muddy patches and some sections with uneven ground).
4) From that point up to Abingdon Lock, the path gradually gets muddier and wetter, even in these frozen conditions. There is a windy part just before the industrial estate comes into view which is still semi-flooded. You can get through and it is away from the main river a little so not dangerous, but it will slow you down (at best) and wet feet are likely. After this short section you go over a wooden bridge and then it is about half a mile to Abingdon Lock. Again this section is semi-flooded and passable but not runnable. There is an alternative route here along the cycle path which runs parallel to the Thames Path, but higher up the field next to the industrial estate. I might ask the organisers whether it would be permissible to take this alternative route (which is marginally further, but a lot drier).
5) Once over Abingdon Lock the route is basically OK again, though there is another field at one point which is still very wet and could get completely waterlogged if the weather gets wetter and warmer again.
In all, it was a long hard slog, and this was less than a quarter of the course. I was wearing Saloman shoes with climalite (ie basically waterproof) which kept my feet mostly warm and dry (though water got over the top on a couple of occassions). I'm planning to meet a friend with a change of shoes at Culham which I'm pretty sure I'll need. (I'll probably need them at every CP, but th
It cut me off! I was just goinig to say that I won't get a change of shoes at each CP.
I hope the above was useful and hasn't put anyone off! On the plus side, everything looked really pretty in the snow.
And if anyone's wondering what I mean by semi-flooded: I'd say that the two sections I mentioned were around 70-80% underwater, albeit generally shallow. It was possible, but difficult, to avoid going straight through any deep water by means of clinging onto trees etc and walking at the edges.
Great report, Lemony, that's really useful. And good run!
Lemony: Thanks for the update, and for your pace info. - makes me feel a bit less bad about how slowly I was running the Streatley to Henley section last weekend (my moving pace averaged a minute slower than yours, which is considerably slower that I was on the much-hillier NDW50 last summer).
Sounds like the section you did was wetter than the section I did. Likelihood of wet feet noted.
Have you sent this description through to the organisers? They asked for mine after I'd said I was going to run Streatley to Henley, and I'm sure they'd appreciate getting this.
Sending this to the organisers is a good idea. I'm not sure where they're based, but I guess it can't do any harm.
I should stress that because of the freezing conditions, most of the course was dry, but there were significant wet sections and there will be more of these if the weather warms up.
Winter tanners tomorrow has been CANCELLED "due to difficult weather conditions" - was probably going to be a problem to get the marshals in place.
Must work out an alternative run for tomorrow, although without the encouragement of an actual event, I doubt I'll make it to 30 miles...
Thanks for the up dates Lemony.
Debra - shame about the Tanners but the right decision, I will be attempting 30 miles tomorrow as well but with the current conditions it looks like I will be doing loops around Greenham Common. See you in 2 weeks.
I posted a while back...my training has been fairly steady at 55 miles each week.....with some longish runs but nothing very different from marathon training. I am super excited but also very scared (my first ultra!).
How well do you need to know the route? Is navigation a problem? I've ran bits and pieces of it but not the whole thing....
Do runners tend to run together? What pace is everyone aiming for? I think avergaing 8.30/9 min miles will be my plan with a few minutes to digest at aid stations.
Karla: I suggest you go read my long post on page 9 (regarding the second half of the course, CP3 to the end) from last weekend and Lemony's long post further up this page. They give info. on places-you-can-go-wrong-and-how-to-avoid-that and on the present ground conditions. You may need to revise your expected pace...
As for running together, that tends to depend on whether you happen on another runner travelling at the same pace as you.
Thanks - those posts are really useful.
I know the Reading to Henley part well but before that not so much. I remember having trouble with a church yard earlier on the route....I've made little notes on my map so hopefully won't get too lost!
I ran a 3.16.34 in Amsterdam in October and will be hoping for sub 3.15 at Manchester in April so I think 9 min miles will hopefully be manageable but very much expecting to walk/run. Its so hard to know how my body will cope with the increased distance. Doing my last back-2-back runs this weekend....looking forward to the taper and carbo-loading!
Fit-Running-Cat I used to live in Ripponden.....Hebden bridge 22 sounds like fun. Assuming you were supposed to be doing the Brass Monkey....sad it's cancelled. All is snowy with me in Edinburgh....pavements are quite treacherous and taxi drivers get annoyed when you run on the road.
I ran 3:09 at the Loch Ness Marathon in October, and my endurance (though not my speed) is slightly better after running up to 70 miles per week for the last few months. Even so, given conditions, I'll be aiming for no better than 10 min/mile for the Thames Trot (including time taken for stop breaks); and if it continues to snow I wouldn't be surprised if I were somewhat slower. This is also my first ultra and my aim is really just to get to the finish.
On finding your way, most of the route is well sign-posted (look out for wooden signs as well as the more common green ones), but there are places where it won't be entirely obvious. Given that we'll be following a river, my top tip is to make a note of every point at which you need to cross the river so you always know whether it is supposed to be on your left or right (and you don't get stuck on the wrong side). There are points where the Path leaves the river, but in relation to the parts of the course I am familiar with, these tend to be reasonably well sign-posted. Also, study the notes relating to the CPs. I realised on Friday that the car park at Culham isn't quite on the Path and whilst I assume that there will be marshals etc making its existence fairly obvious, it would be possible to run straight past (and you do need to 'check in' at each CP). I don't know the other CP areas, so I'm going to have to study the descriptions well.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |