I read a lot of people talking about reverse splits in Marathons as the best strategy but less detail on how extreme to make the difference between the two halves. Let me give a (not so hypothetical) example.
I am running the Brighton Marathon in April 2013. A time under 3 hours 15 mins gets me a good for age place in the 2014 London Marathon. I have a 1:29 half marathon under my belt in the summer so 3 hours 4 minutes might be a reasonable target, which is scarily close to 3 hours.
I would like to give myself a shot at under 3 hours but do not want to go off so quick and blow up in the second half - perhaps even ruining my good for age time for London. So a reverse split would seem to be the way to go. If I go for 1:32 in the first half does that give me too much to do in the second half? Should I go even slower in the second half.?
I have a couple of 20 mile races to rehearse at but interested if there is any formula or advice on a reverse split.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |