Latest Ratings
| 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: WOW!! In full: A pity I am at a wedding next new year, else I would be dreaming about my costume already . . . Date of review: January 2, 2010
|
2008 Run to the Beat
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: first time is no excuse In full: Has all already been said - no marshalling or information at the start, most of the music spots were essentially pathetic, signage on the course was below par (missed most mile markers), my garamin also said 13.25, no water at the end - had to walk maybe 300m to get water . . . .
first time is no excuse for a race in such a setting - closing down a significant part of se London.
on the positive side - a good course and good organisation on the course.
Date of review: October 5, 2008
|
2006 Marafun
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: small & friendly In full: your best chance of a podium finish (if they had a podium!). Very small and friendly but beginners should be aware that there is an orienteering aspect to it :-))
Date of review: May 7, 2006
|
2004 Jog Shop Jog 20
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: The view from the top of the downs almost made the climbs worthwhile. Date of review: August 31, 2004
|

| |