Latest Ratings
| 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 South London 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: hot and hilly In full: was very hot even early(ish) in the day and the hill as well made this a tougher race than expected and I doubt anyone ran quick. Decent suburban run though with good organisation and support. out or curiosity I dont know why numbers were posted and then chips picked up on the day - but it didnt matter as everything was organised well. WOuld do their races again. Date of review: May 23, 2010
|
2010 Gloucester Marathon – Epney
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: some good points and some not so good points In full: A nice race with a decent course, a welcoming atmosphere, excellent marshals and some really good support from spectators and runners alike. There are definitely races with more frills out there. To have half filled cups at water stations, no sort of recovery drink at the end (just tap water), minimal advance info and a ten minute wait seizing up in the cold to get a bus back to the start take the shine of it. But a promising race and one that will be interesting to see how it develops - with some small amendments it would be excellent Date of review: January 25, 2010
|
2009 Grand Union Canal Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The terrain Date of review: November 8, 2009
|
2009 Wimbledon Premier 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good Date of review: March 22, 2009
|
2008 Ryde 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A tough slog but well worth it In full: Loved it. Not PB material with constant ups and downs but with cracking scenery and good and friendly organisation. Well worth the trip across the Solent. Just know you will suffer on the hills! Date of review: August 19, 2008
|
2008 Tewkesbury Half Marathon & 5 Mile Fun Run
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: shocking organisation. No Marshalls, no water, poorly organised pre-race, poorly organised start and finish. Boiling hot weather didnt help and was the one thing the organisers couldnt be blamed for. Date of review: May 12, 2008
|

| |