Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 31 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
2011 British 10K; Run for Seafarers UK
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A fun run, not a race, and over-priced In full: You will have to run at the speed of the crowd, so regard it as a funrun, not a race, and see the sights. If you can afford it. Date of review: July 10, 2011
|
2010 Votwo Pembrokeshire Coastal Challenge 78.6
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: As much of a hike as a run ! In full: Seventy eight miles of ups and downs on the Cornish Coastpath. Brilliantly organised by Votwo. Date of review: October 4, 2010
|
2010 City of Salisbury 10 Mile Road Race
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely course, but some traffic problems In full: Could have done with a bit more marshalling of the traffic on parts of the course, the drivers were all over the road and didnt have any idea what to do Date of review: March 7, 2010
|
2009 46th Hogs Back 8
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: They ran out of water - unforgivable - a beginners mistake In full: And a race license requires them to provide a water station. It's not as if they haven't run a race before, allegedly, or have no way of knowing how many people will come - they set the race limit. Date of review: December 13, 2009
|
2009 Luton Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A lovely race if you wrap up warm! Date of review: December 6, 2009
|
2009 Belgrave 5K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well marshalled Date of review: August 9, 2009
|
2009 Salomon South Downs Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Fantastic scenery but killer hills In full: Could do with a little more organisation at checkpoints -- keep the marathoners apart from the relayers maybe? Date of review: June 14, 2009
|
2009 Finchley 20
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I like the 4-lap format Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2008 46th Hogs Back 8
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Best feature was the cakes at the end Date of review: December 14, 2008
|
2008 New Forest Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely race - but no showers! In full: Not the organisers fault I suppose, but the showers at the finish were out of order. Date of review: September 21, 2008
|

| |