Latest Ratings
| 11 to 15 of 15 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2005 Stockport 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well-organised, friendly fab race with an excellent goody bag! In full: Fantastic day, great course with a couple of little hills to give you something to think about. Fabulous atomosphere and great organisation makes a definite must do in my diary Date of review: December 12, 2005
|
2005 Preston 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: great course and fab organisation Date of review: November 21, 2005
|
2005 Gin Pit 5
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic race with a great atomosphere In full: Well organised and great support from the marshalls and everyone posted round the course. Will definitely try and do the next one Date of review: May 19, 2005
|
2005 Chernobyl 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good scenic race, traffic-free and not too hilly Date of review: January 31, 2005
|
2004 Stockport 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Really enjoyed the track bit and the hills werent as bad as anticipated Date of review: December 15, 2004
|

| |