Latest Ratings
| 11 to 20 of 42 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2010 Chedworth Roman Trail 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Beautiful event In full: Great all round - most encouraging marshalls ever, awesome scenery and not too tough. Pen much better than a medal or the paperweight last time I did it. A recycled one would be better still. Very special indeed. Date of review: March 25, 2010
|
2010 The H30 Pro Castle Combe 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great atmosphere and organisation In full: Very classy race, great buzz with the duathlon at the same event. Good cafe - good places to get warm on another cold and wet day. Nice showers if you can find them. Goody bags, tshirt. Loads of prizes.Love it. Date of review: March 1, 2010
|
2010 May Hill Massacre
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyed it, afterwards Date of review: February 8, 2010
|
2009 Cirencester 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race on a beautiful day In full: It was almost too hot, but plenty of shade round the course. The start is very narrow for a race this size. Great organisations and friendly marshalls, very good overall. Date of review: September 27, 2009
|
2009 Westonbirt National Arboretum 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A true classic In full: I turned up with a long overdue PB in mind and got it - by 1.45. Conditions were ideal. The goody bag contains only a tree - its my 3rd time there so a decent forest developing in my garden. Date of review: June 9, 2009
|
2009 5 mile series Gloucester
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good course, look forward to more In full: Very low turnout - deserves more support, decent course with small 2 or 3 small hills but mostly flat and quiet. No-one really told me that the start was 1km away from HQ, so nearly missed it! Otherwise another great Gloucester event Date of review: May 27, 2009
|
2009 Gloucester 20
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not as good as it used to be In full: I also got a warning from the cross official - totally understand the point but how racing isn't much fun if you are not allowed to overtake other contestants without risking disqualification. I and many others thought the mile markers were inaccurate and the race 0.3 miles too long. Thanks to marshalls who kept smiling through awful conditions. Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 Gloucester New Year 10
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good race but silly place to start it In full: I can cope with the walk back from the finish (though can understand if some find that a problem), but surely something better can be found for a start other than 400 people crowding onto a busy road with traffic coming from either side. Why not start at the sports centre and finish earlier on the lane? Date of review: January 4, 2009
|
2008 Oldbury 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Flat, fast course, big race feeling but no-one watching except police with massive guns In full: The course was somewhat monotonous but very little traffic and fast on a windless day. Liked the banana and muesli bar - every race should have this at the end,I'm fed up of breaking my teeth trying to eat medals. Date of review: September 1, 2008
|
2008 Cleevewold 14
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Top quality occasion In full: The finish is virtually inside the pub, and everyone has a beer in hand within half a minute, great way to create an atmosphere at the end and make us forget the definitely hilly hills (undulating doesnt enter into it - the first 5k is pretty flat, the 2nd 5k pretty hilly). £8 is a great price for everything involved, special mention due for very hassle free parking. Date of review: August 14, 2008
|

| |