Latest Ratings
| 11 to 12 of 12 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2005 British 10K
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very poor value, over crowded, no timing or positions. In full: I definately will not run this again unless big changes are made. 1. Too expensive 2. Poor oranisation in general 3. No properly defined finish line. 4. Poorly managed drink stations 5. No chip timing 6. No official postions 7. medals given to you at baggage collection 8. No goody bag 9. My race number didnt have a baggage bay? 10. Only good thing was the scenery, if your a tourist. Date of review: July 4, 2005
|
2005 Virgin London Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The best in the World but could be better. In full: There needs to be a look at the repatriation area, when i finished it was complete chaos getting to it. not what you want when you have just finished a marathon. Date of review: April 20, 2005
|

| |