My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Nothing really compares for the atmosphere.
In full: Wish the Expo was easier to get to and the changing tents a bit closer to the finish, but they're the only gripes I can think of.
Date of review: April 16, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		40%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Good race, well organised & lots of marshals. Req. chip timing tho.
Date of review: April 2, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Lots of marshals. Great setting and welcoming club.
In full: My performance was bobbins but this is still a good race. Not really got any criticisms, just some feedback; maybe try and stretch out the predicted finish time markers ath the start. It was a little claustraphobic until you got onto the road.
Date of review: January 20, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: A nice low key event, well marshalled and signed. Well worth turning up to do.
In full: I last did this a couple of years ago and there didnt seem to be as many people as a couple of years ago, but there were local XC on in the afternoon. This is a challenging course although slightly shorter that 5 miles (4.7) and the finish up the hill is a bit of a killer. No complaints at all about the race or organisation, it all went well as far as I was concerned although a did see a couple of guys who went off course and had to double back but not sure how they could go wrong. All being well see you next year.
Date of review: January 14, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Beautiful scenery and a great day out.
In full: The views of the lake at 1/ miles were well worth the money.
Date of review: November 4, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: Wonderful race. Needs to be on the
Date of review: November 4, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: a well organised scenic, friendly big challenge! brilliant
Date of review: October 28, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Ive said it all before. Top race & top series.
In full: If only Graham could get the weather right in Keswick in September, we'd have nothing at all to complain about. Roll on Ullswater.
Date of review: October 12, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Who care about rain when you've got races like this.
Date of review: September 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: What can I say; Top class organisation, Great parks to run in, Warm & friendly atmosphere. Must do again for next year.
Date of review: July 6, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator