My Event Ratings

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: I liked this race a lot. Nice villagey/rustic feel, friendly bunch. The finish was a little disorganised though. There's one long incline around 7km but apart from that, the reports of the race's hilliness are exaggerated! Could be a PB course.
Date of review: February 6, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		40%

In short: Beautiful location, well organised. Nice post-Christmas atmosphere. Disappointing memento (plastic water bottle) but everything else was good. Highly recommended for blowing Christmas out of your system.
Date of review: December 27, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		40%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: Great to run by the sea, and dead flat. The organisation was a bit hit-and-miss (eg few distance markers, pedestrians mingling with the runners), but overall, a recommendable race with a good crowd of runners.
Date of review: October 4, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		40%
Would you do it again?		No
Details:
Scenery		40%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		20%
Value		20%

In short: Very poor organisation. No response to emails. I had to pay 10 for a medal and still,no one can tell me when or how I will receive it. Very disorganised finish - no chocolate left for the slower runners, and only small/med t-shirts! A cliquey event
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%

In short: It's rightly noted that this isn't a scenic race, but nevertheless it has a uniqueness that I'm growing to like. 2004 better than 2003, with more atmosphere. The worst thingis the name: "the London Half" is a pretty outrageous piece of mis-marketing!
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%

In short: Great place for a race. Just 2 negatives: only 2 or 3 distance markers, and miserable marshals!
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator